headscale/hscontrol/state/connect_test.go
Kristoffer Dalby 5228cb1a40 change: drop subnet-router full update, use policy change
Don't send a full update when a subnet router goes up or down; the gated
policy change already recomputes peers and is a smaller payload.

Updates #3293
2026-06-03 19:05:24 +02:00

217 lines
7.3 KiB
Go

package state
import (
"net/netip"
"testing"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types/change"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
)
// runtimePeerComputationReasons returns the Reason of every change in cs that
// carries RequiresRuntimePeerComputation. Each such change makes the batcher
// rebuild a full netmap (packet filters, SSH policy, peer serialization) for
// every connected node, so it is the expensive fan-out the issue is about.
func runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs []change.Change) []string {
var reasons []string
for _, c := range cs {
if c.RequiresRuntimePeerComputation {
reasons = append(reasons, c.Reason)
}
}
return reasons
}
// hasPeerPatch reports whether any change carries a lightweight PeerChange
// patch (e.g. the online/offline indicator). This is the cheap notification a
// reconnect should produce instead of a full runtime recompute.
func hasPeerPatch(cs []change.Change) bool {
for _, c := range cs {
if len(c.PeerPatches) > 0 {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// forcesPeerRecompute reports whether any change makes peers rebuild a full
// netmap, whether via a full update (subnet-router path) or a runtime peer
// computation (relay/via path).
func forcesPeerRecompute(cs []change.Change) bool {
for _, c := range cs {
if c.IsFull() || c.RequiresRuntimePeerComputation {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// TestConnectDisconnectOrdinaryNodeNoRuntimeRecompute asserts that an ordinary
// node coming online or going offline only sends the lightweight online/offline
// peer patch and does not trigger a runtime peer recompute.
//
// State.Connect and State.Disconnect gate change.PolicyChange() (which sets
// RequiresRuntimePeerComputation, forcing the batcher to rebuild a full netmap
// for every connected node) on NodeNeedsPeerRecompute. An ordinary node is
// neither a subnet router, a relay target, nor a via target, so the gate is
// false and no recompute is emitted.
//
// Emitting that recompute unconditionally turned each reconnect into O(N) full
// netmap rebuilds (and a reconnect storm into O(N^2)), which saturated CPU
// after the v0.28 -> v0.29 upgrade.
func TestConnectDisconnectOrdinaryNodeNoRuntimeRecompute(t *testing.T) {
_, s, nodeID := persistTestSetup(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { _ = s.Close() })
t.Run("connect", func(t *testing.T) {
cs, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
require.NotZero(t, epoch, "Connect should return a session epoch")
assert.True(t, hasPeerPatch(cs),
"Connect should still emit a lightweight online peer patch")
reasons := runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs)
assert.Empty(t, reasons,
"ordinary node connect must not trigger a runtime peer recompute; "+
"got RequiresRuntimePeerComputation changes: %v", reasons)
})
t.Run("disconnect", func(t *testing.T) {
// Connect first so Disconnect's epoch check passes.
_, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
cs, err := s.Disconnect(nodeID, epoch)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, hasPeerPatch(cs),
"Disconnect should still emit a lightweight offline peer patch")
reasons := runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs)
assert.Empty(t, reasons,
"ordinary node disconnect must not trigger a runtime peer recompute; "+
"got RequiresRuntimePeerComputation changes: %v", reasons)
})
}
// TestConnectDisconnectRelayTargetTriggersRecompute locks the cap/relay case:
// a relay target is not a subnet router, so the only thing that makes its
// connect/disconnect emit a runtime peer recompute is the
// NodeNeedsPeerRecompute gate. Peers must still receive that recompute so they
// drop a stale PeerRelay allocation when the relay goes offline.
func TestConnectDisconnectRelayTargetTriggersRecompute(t *testing.T) {
_, s, nodeID := persistTestSetup(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { _ = s.Close() })
// A cap/relay grant whose destination resolves to the node's owning
// user makes the node a relay target without making it a subnet router.
relayPolicy := `{"grants":[{"src":["*"],"dst":["persist-user@"],"app":{"tailscale.com/cap/relay":[{}]}}]}`
_, err := s.SetPolicy([]byte(relayPolicy))
require.NoError(t, err)
t.Run("connect", func(t *testing.T) {
cs, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
require.NotZero(t, epoch)
assert.NotEmpty(t, runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs),
"relay-target node connect must trigger a runtime peer recompute")
})
t.Run("disconnect", func(t *testing.T) {
_, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
cs, err := s.Disconnect(nodeID, epoch)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.NotEmpty(t, runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs),
"relay-target node disconnect must trigger a runtime peer recompute")
})
}
// TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterForcesRecompute guards that a subnet router
// still forces peers to recompute on connect/disconnect (primary-route
// failover changes their AllowedIPs), so the gate does not over-suppress.
func TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterForcesRecompute(t *testing.T) {
_, s, nodeID := persistTestSetup(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { _ = s.Close() })
route := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24")
_, ok := s.nodeStore.UpdateNode(nodeID, func(n *types.Node) {
n.Hostinfo = &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{route}}
n.ApprovedRoutes = []netip.Prefix{route}
})
require.True(t, ok)
t.Run("connect", func(t *testing.T) {
cs, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
require.NotZero(t, epoch)
assert.True(t, forcesPeerRecompute(cs),
"subnet router connect must force a peer recompute")
})
t.Run("disconnect", func(t *testing.T) {
_, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
cs, err := s.Disconnect(nodeID, epoch)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, forcesPeerRecompute(cs),
"subnet router disconnect must force a peer recompute")
})
}
// TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterEmitsPolicyChangeNotFull pins how a subnet
// router forces that recompute: through the gated change.PolicyChange() (a
// runtime peer recompute) and the lightweight online/offline peer patch, not a
// full update. policyChangeResponse is a strict subset of a full update yet
// still carries primary-route failover, so the heavier FullUpdate that the
// online/offline change once emitted for subnet routers is unnecessary.
func TestConnectDisconnectSubnetRouterEmitsPolicyChangeNotFull(t *testing.T) {
_, s, nodeID := persistTestSetup(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { _ = s.Close() })
route := netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24")
_, ok := s.nodeStore.UpdateNode(nodeID, func(n *types.Node) {
n.Hostinfo = &tailcfg.Hostinfo{RoutableIPs: []netip.Prefix{route}}
n.ApprovedRoutes = []netip.Prefix{route}
})
require.True(t, ok)
assertRecomputeNotFull := func(t *testing.T, cs []change.Change) {
t.Helper()
assert.NotEmpty(t, runtimePeerComputationReasons(cs),
"subnet router must still drive a runtime peer recompute")
assert.True(t, hasPeerPatch(cs),
"subnet router should still emit the lightweight online/offline patch")
for _, c := range cs {
assert.Falsef(t, c.IsFull(),
"subnet router recompute must be a PolicyChange, not a full update: %q", c.Reason)
}
}
t.Run("connect", func(t *testing.T) {
cs, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
require.NotZero(t, epoch)
assertRecomputeNotFull(t, cs)
})
t.Run("disconnect", func(t *testing.T) {
_, epoch := s.Connect(nodeID)
cs, err := s.Disconnect(nodeID, epoch)
require.NoError(t, err)
assertRecomputeNotFull(t, cs)
})
}