Two readers shared a stream without agreeing, and a length was taken on trust

IfxSocket owns a read-ahead buffer that BufferedSocketReader fills and
drains. Connection._drain_to_eot, _raise_sq_err and the login path
bypass that reader and call IfxSocket.read_exact directly, which recv'd
from the socket without looking at the buffer. Bytes sitting in the
buffer were skipped, and skipped bytes in a length-framed protocol do
not announce themselves -- the next read lands mid-field and every read
after it is wrong.

Nothing triggers it today. The server sends one response per request, so
recv returns exactly that response and the buffered reader consumes all
of it before control returns to a direct read. That is a property of the
traffic, not of the code, and the buffer is connection-scoped precisely
so read-ahead can cross response boundaries -- pipelined executemany
already puts several responses in flight. read_exact now drains the
buffer first, which costs one branch on a cold path and makes the two
paths agree by construction rather than by luck.

fill_recv_buf believed whatever byte count it was handed, and that count
is almost always a length field straight off the wire. A garbage
0x7FFFFFFF reads as a 2 GB request and the fill loop sits in recv until
the read timeout while the buffer grows. It now refuses above
IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES (256 MiB default) with an error naming the number,
which is the actual diagnostic: a length that absurd means framing was
already lost upstream.

BufferedSocketReader.skip advanced the cursor arithmetically with no
guard, so a negative count rewound it and re-decoded consumed bytes as
the next field. The base reader's skip delegates to read_exact and does
guard; this one diverged.

Transaction control run as SQL desynced Connection._in_transaction,
which is what commit() and rollback() are guarded by and what the pool
reads to decide whether a returned connection needs cleaning up. With
autocommit on, cursor.execute("BEGIN WORK") opened a real transaction
while the flag stayed False, so rollback() returned successfully having
sent nothing and the rows it was asked to discard survived. The
connection then went back to the pool holding an open transaction and
its locks. With autocommit off it failed instead: the driver's implicit
SQ_BEGIN fired first and the caller's BEGIN WORK got -535.

The server labels these -- 34 BEGIN, 35 COMMIT, 36 ROLLBACK, with and
without the WORK keyword, measured on all three versions. JDBC reads the
same values off the describe and calls setTxBeginState/setTxEndState.
_ensure_transaction moves to after the describe, matching JDBC's
initiateTransaction placement, which is what makes it possible to skip
for transaction control at all -- until the describe lands you cannot
know that is what the statement is.
This commit is contained in:
Ryan Malloy 2026-09-02 00:54:12 -06:00
parent c67bbc4766
commit 5ad296419c
5 changed files with 502 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -292,6 +292,13 @@ class BufferedSocketReader(IfxStreamReader):
return b
def skip(self, n: int) -> None:
# The base reader's skip delegates to read_exact, which returns
# b"" for n <= 0. This one advances the cursor arithmetically, so
# without the guard a negative n *rewinds* it — silently
# re-decoding bytes already consumed as if they were the next
# field. Same divergence as read_exact, which does guard.
if n <= 0:
return
sock = self._sock
sock.fill_recv_buf(n)
sock._recv_pos += n

View File

@ -17,11 +17,35 @@ the rest of the protocol layer.
from __future__ import annotations
import contextlib
import os
import socket
import ssl
from ._protocol import ProtocolError
from .exceptions import InterfaceError, OperationalError
def _max_read_bytes() -> int:
"""Ceiling for a single length-prefixed read, from IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES.
256 MiB by default: comfortably above any row, string table, or blob
chunk a real query produces, and far below the values a desynced
stream invents. A genuinely larger single value is possible (a very
large TEXT column read in one go), which is why the knob exists.
"""
raw = os.environ.get("IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES")
if raw:
try:
value = int(raw)
except ValueError:
value = 0
if value > 0:
return value
return 256 * 1024 * 1024
MAX_READ_BYTES = _max_read_bytes()
# A ``tls`` parameter to ``IfxSocket`` accepts:
# False (default) — plain TCP
# True — TLS with verification disabled (dev / self-signed)
@ -124,10 +148,42 @@ class IfxSocket:
raise OperationalError(f"write failed: {e}") from e
def read_exact(self, n: int) -> bytes:
"""Read exactly ``n`` bytes or raise on EOF / timeout."""
"""Read exactly ``n`` bytes or raise on EOF / timeout.
Consumes the read-ahead buffer before touching the socket. This
matters because two readers share one stream: ``BufferedSocketReader``
fills ``_recv_buf`` (over-reading by design, up to ``_recv_size``),
while ``Connection._drain_to_eot``, ``_raise_sq_err`` and the
login path call this method directly. Recv'ing here while bytes
sat unconsumed in the buffer would skip them, and skipped bytes
in a length-framed protocol don't announce themselves — the next
read lands mid-field and every subsequent one is wrong.
No workload triggers it today: the server sends one response per
request, so recv returns exactly that response and the buffered
reader consumes all of it before control returns here. That is a
property of the traffic, not of the code. Pipelined executemany
already puts multiple responses in flight, and the buffer is
connection-scoped precisely so read-ahead can cross response
boundaries. Making the two paths agree by construction costs one
branch on a cold path.
"""
if self._sock is None:
raise InterfaceError("socket is closed")
if n <= 0:
return b""
wanted = n
chunks: list[bytes] = []
buffered = len(self._recv_buf) - self._recv_pos
if buffered > 0:
take = min(buffered, n)
chunks.append(
bytes(self._recv_buf[self._recv_pos : self._recv_pos + take])
)
self._recv_pos += take
n -= take
if n == 0:
return chunks[0]
remaining = n
while remaining > 0:
try:
@ -138,7 +194,8 @@ class IfxSocket:
if not chunk:
self._force_close()
raise OperationalError(
f"server closed connection mid-read (wanted {n} bytes, got {n - remaining})"
f"server closed connection mid-read "
f"(wanted {wanted} bytes, got {wanted - remaining})"
)
chunks.append(chunk)
remaining -= len(chunk)
@ -155,6 +212,21 @@ class IfxSocket:
"""
if self._sock is None:
raise InterfaceError("socket is closed")
if need > MAX_READ_BYTES:
# ``need`` is almost always a length field straight off the
# wire. Trusting it means a corrupt or desynced stream turns
# into an allocation of whatever that field happened to say —
# a garbage 0x7FFFFFFF reads as a 2 GB request, and the loop
# below sits in recv until the read timeout while the buffer
# grows. Refusing names the number instead, which is the
# diagnostic: a length that absurd means framing is already
# lost upstream, not that the row is genuinely that big.
raise ProtocolError(
f"refusing to read {need} bytes in one field (limit "
f"{MAX_READ_BYTES}). Either the wire has desynced, or a "
f"single value really is this large — raise the limit "
f"with the IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES environment variable."
)
avail = len(self._recv_buf) - self._recv_pos
if avail >= need:
return

View File

@ -108,6 +108,15 @@ def _make_socket_reader(sock):
_ST_SELECT = 2
_ST_ROUTINE = 56 # EXECUTE PROCEDURE / EXECUTE FUNCTION
# Transaction control run as SQL. JDBC reads the same three values off
# the describe and calls setTxBeginState / setTxEndState (IfxSqli, the
# TxStmt field). Both ``BEGIN`` and ``BEGIN WORK`` report 34; likewise
# the WORK-less spellings of the other two.
_ST_TX_BEGIN = 34
_ST_TX_COMMIT = 35
_ST_TX_ROLLBACK = 36
_TX_CONTROL_TYPES = frozenset({_ST_TX_BEGIN, _ST_TX_COMMIT, _ST_TX_ROLLBACK})
def _produces_result_set(statement_type: int, ncolumns: int) -> bool:
"""Whether a prepared statement needs a cursor opened for it.
@ -423,12 +432,6 @@ class Cursor:
self._statement_type = 0
self._statement_already_done = False
# On a logged DB in non-autocommit mode, the server requires an
# explicit SQ_BEGIN before the first DML in each transaction.
# _ensure_transaction is a no-op for autocommit / unlogged DBs,
# and idempotent within an open transaction.
self._conn._ensure_transaction()
# Step 1: PREPARE — send SQL with numQmarks = len(params).
# statement_boundary: nothing is open server-side yet, so this is
# the one safe moment to flush a finalizer's deferred cleanup.
@ -438,6 +441,21 @@ class Cursor:
)
self._read_describe_response()
# On a logged DB in non-autocommit mode, the server requires an
# explicit SQ_BEGIN before the first DML in each transaction.
# _ensure_transaction is a no-op for autocommit / unlogged DBs,
# and idempotent within an open transaction.
#
# This runs *after* the describe, matching JDBC's
# initiateTransaction placement, because until the describe lands
# we don't know whether the caller's statement is itself
# transaction control. Opening a transaction on their behalf and
# then executing their BEGIN WORK gets -535, "already in
# transaction" — the driver competing with the user for the same
# job and the user losing.
if self._statement_type not in _TX_CONTROL_TYPES:
self._conn._ensure_transaction()
# Ask the server what it just prepared, rather than guessing from
# the first word of the SQL.
if _produces_result_set(self._statement_type, len(self._columns)):
@ -450,6 +468,11 @@ class Cursor:
else:
self._execute_dml()
# The statement succeeded. If it was transaction control, the
# server's transaction state just changed and the connection has
# to know, or commit() and rollback() silently do nothing.
self._note_transaction_control()
# SELECT path: position cursor before the first row so the next
# ``fetchone()`` returns ``rows[0]``. DML paths leave _row_index
# at -1 too (no rows to iterate).
@ -458,6 +481,30 @@ class Cursor:
if self._description is not None:
self._row_index = -1
def _note_transaction_control(self) -> None:
"""Sync the connection's transaction flag after a successful execute.
``BEGIN WORK`` run through ``execute()`` opens a real transaction
on the server, and the connection had no idea. With autocommit on
nothing stopped it reaching the server, so ``_in_transaction``
stayed False while a transaction was open and both ``commit()``
and ``rollback()`` are guarded by that flag. ``rollback()``
returned successfully having sent nothing, and the rows it was
asked to discard were still there.
The pool reads the same flag to decide whether a returned
connection needs cleaning up, so the connection went back into
circulation holding an open transaction and its locks.
Called only on the success path: a statement that failed did not
change the server's transaction state.
"""
statement_type = self._statement_type
if statement_type == _ST_TX_BEGIN:
self._conn._in_transaction = True
elif statement_type in (_ST_TX_COMMIT, _ST_TX_ROLLBACK):
self._conn._in_transaction = False
def _close_server_cursor(self) -> None:
"""Free the server-side scrollable cursor. Caller MUST hold ``_wire_lock``.
@ -1132,10 +1179,6 @@ class Cursor:
self._statement_type = 0
self._statement_already_done = False
# Logged-DB transaction guard — same as execute(). Idempotent
# within an open transaction.
self._conn._ensure_transaction()
# PREPARE once.
self._conn._send_pdu(
self._build_prepare_pdu(sql, num_qmarks=first_len),
@ -1155,6 +1198,11 @@ class Cursor:
"supported"
)
# Logged-DB transaction guard — same as execute(), and for the
# same reason placed after the describe rather than before it.
if self._statement_type not in _TX_CONTROL_TYPES:
self._conn._ensure_transaction()
# Phase 33: pipeline — build all BIND+EXECUTE PDUs first
# (Python work, no I/O), then send them back-to-back, then
# drain all responses. Eliminates the per-row round-trip

172
tests/test_socket_reads.py Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
"""Two readers, one stream, and a length field taken on trust.
``IfxSocket`` owns a read-ahead buffer that ``BufferedSocketReader``
fills and drains. But ``Connection._drain_to_eot``, ``_raise_sq_err``
and the login path bypass that reader and call ``IfxSocket.read_exact``
directly, which recv'd from the socket without ever looking at the
buffer. Bytes sitting in the buffer would simply be skipped, and skipped
bytes in a length-framed protocol don't announce themselves — the next
read lands mid-field and every read after it is wrong.
Nothing triggers it today. The server sends one response per request, so
recv returns exactly that response and the buffered reader consumes all
of it before control returns to a direct read. That is a property of the
traffic, not of the code, and the buffer is connection-scoped precisely
so read-ahead *can* cross response boundaries pipelined executemany
already puts several responses in flight. A latent desync waiting on a
timing change is not a good thing to leave in a wire protocol.
Separately, ``fill_recv_buf`` took its byte count on trust, and that
count is almost always a length field straight off the wire. A corrupt
or desynced stream turned into an allocation of whatever the field
happened to say: a garbage ``0x7FFFFFFF`` reads as a 2 GB request, and
the fill loop sits in recv until the read timeout while the buffer
grows. The limit turns that into an error that names the number, which
is the actual diagnostic a length that absurd means framing was
already lost upstream.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from informix_db._protocol import BufferedSocketReader, ProtocolError
from informix_db._socket import MAX_READ_BYTES, IfxSocket
class _FakeSocket:
"""Stands in for the raw socket. Records what recv actually asked for."""
def __init__(self, data: bytes = b"") -> None:
self.data = data
self.pos = 0
self.recv_calls: list[int] = []
def recv(self, n: int) -> bytes:
self.recv_calls.append(n)
chunk = self.data[self.pos : self.pos + n]
self.pos += len(chunk)
return chunk
def close(self) -> None:
# The EOF path force-closes; a stand-in has to survive that.
pass
def _socket_with(buffered: bytes, on_wire: bytes = b"") -> IfxSocket:
"""An IfxSocket with ``buffered`` already read ahead into _recv_buf."""
sock = IfxSocket.__new__(IfxSocket)
sock._sock = _FakeSocket(on_wire)
sock._recv_buf = bytearray(buffered)
sock._recv_pos = 0
sock._recv_size = 65536
sock._read_timeout = None
return sock
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# read_exact must not step over the buffer
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_read_exact_consumes_the_buffer_first() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"BUFFERED", on_wire=b"SOCKET")
assert sock.read_exact(8) == b"BUFFERED"
assert sock._sock.recv_calls == [], "must not touch the socket at all"
assert sock._recv_pos == 8
def test_read_exact_spans_buffer_then_socket() -> None:
"""The interesting case: a read that starts in the buffer and
finishes on the wire. Getting this wrong reorders the stream."""
sock = _socket_with(b"HEAD", on_wire=b"TAIL")
assert sock.read_exact(8) == b"HEADTAIL"
assert sock._sock.recv_calls == [4], "only the shortfall comes from recv"
def test_read_exact_respects_a_partly_consumed_buffer() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"XXABCD")
sock._recv_pos = 2 # first two bytes already decoded
assert sock.read_exact(4) == b"ABCD"
assert sock._sock.recv_calls == []
def test_read_exact_of_zero_is_empty() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"DATA")
assert sock.read_exact(0) == b""
assert sock.read_exact(-5) == b"", "a negative count must not rewind"
assert sock._recv_pos == 0
def test_short_read_error_reports_the_original_request() -> None:
"""The message counts bytes; taking some from the buffer must not make
it lie about how many were asked for."""
from informix_db.exceptions import OperationalError
sock = _socket_with(b"AB", on_wire=b"") # 2 buffered, nothing on the wire
with pytest.raises(OperationalError, match="wanted 10 bytes"):
sock.read_exact(10)
def test_buffered_reader_and_direct_read_agree_on_one_stream() -> None:
"""End to end: a BufferedSocketReader over-reads, then a direct
read_exact picks up exactly where it left off."""
sock = _socket_with(b"", on_wire=b"\x00\x2aREST-OF-THE-STREAM")
reader = BufferedSocketReader(sock)
assert reader.read_short() == 42
assert len(sock._recv_buf) - sock._recv_pos > 0, (
"precondition: the reader must have over-read for this to mean "
"anything"
)
assert sock.read_exact(18) == b"REST-OF-THE-STREAM"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# fill_recv_buf must not believe an arbitrary length
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_absurd_length_is_refused_not_allocated() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"", on_wire=b"")
with pytest.raises(ProtocolError, match="refusing to read"):
sock.fill_recv_buf(MAX_READ_BYTES + 1)
assert sock._sock.recv_calls == [], "must refuse before any recv"
def test_refusal_names_the_knob() -> None:
"""The error has to be actionable in both directions: framing is lost,
or the value genuinely is that big and the limit needs raising."""
sock = _socket_with(b"", on_wire=b"")
with pytest.raises(ProtocolError) as exc:
sock.fill_recv_buf(2**31 - 1)
message = str(exc.value)
assert "2147483647" in message
assert "IFX_MAX_READ_BYTES" in message
def test_a_normal_length_is_unaffected() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"", on_wire=b"x" * 100)
sock.fill_recv_buf(100)
assert len(sock._recv_buf) - sock._recv_pos >= 100
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# skip
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_buffered_skip_does_not_rewind_on_a_negative_count() -> None:
"""The base reader's skip delegates to read_exact, which guards. This
one advances the cursor arithmetically, so an unguarded negative count
re-decodes bytes already consumed as if they were the next field."""
sock = _socket_with(b"ABCDEFGH")
sock._recv_pos = 4
BufferedSocketReader(sock).skip(-4)
assert sock._recv_pos == 4, "skip must never move the cursor backwards"
def test_buffered_skip_advances_normally() -> None:
sock = _socket_with(b"ABCDEFGH")
reader = BufferedSocketReader(sock)
reader.skip(4)
assert reader.read_exact(4) == b"EFGH"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
"""Transaction control run as SQL, and the flag that didn't notice.
``Connection._in_transaction`` decides whether ``commit()`` and
``rollback()`` send anything at all, and the pool reads it to decide
whether a returned connection needs cleaning up. It was maintained
solely by the driver's own implicit ``SQ_BEGIN``, so a caller who wrote
``cursor.execute("BEGIN WORK")`` an entirely reasonable thing to
write walked straight past it.
With autocommit on, nothing stopped that statement reaching the server.
A transaction opened, the flag stayed False, and ``rollback()`` returned
successfully having sent nothing. The rows it was asked to discard were
still there. The connection then went back to the pool holding an open
transaction and its locks, because the pool's cleanup is guarded by the
same flag.
With autocommit off it failed instead, and for a sillier reason: the
driver's implicit ``SQ_BEGIN`` fired first, so the caller's ``BEGIN
WORK`` got ``-535``, "already in transaction". The driver and the user
competing to open the same transaction, and the user losing.
The server labels these statements: type 34 for BEGIN, 35 for COMMIT, 36
for ROLLBACK, with and without the ``WORK`` keyword. JDBC reads the same
three values off the describe and calls ``setTxBeginState`` /
``setTxEndState``. It also calls ``initiateTransaction`` *after* the
describe rather than before, which is what makes the skip possible
until the describe lands you can't know the statement is transaction
control.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import contextlib
import pytest
import informix_db
from informix_db.cursors import _TX_CONTROL_TYPES
from tests.conftest import ConnParams
pytestmark = pytest.mark.integration
def _connect(conn_params: ConnParams, **kw) -> informix_db.Connection:
return informix_db.connect(
host=conn_params.host,
port=conn_params.port,
user=conn_params.user,
password=conn_params.password,
database=conn_params.database,
server=conn_params.server,
connect_timeout=10.0,
read_timeout=25.0,
**kw,
)
def test_transaction_control_types_are_what_the_server_says(
logged_db_params: ConnParams,
) -> None:
"""Pin the three constants against a live server rather than trusting
the decompiled source. Both spellings must map to the same type."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
seen = {}
for sql in ("BEGIN WORK", "COMMIT WORK", "ROLLBACK WORK",
"BEGIN", "COMMIT", "ROLLBACK"):
with conn._wire_lock:
conn._send_pdu(
cur._build_prepare_pdu(sql, num_qmarks=0),
statement_boundary=True,
)
cur._read_describe_response()
cur._release_after_failure()
seen[sql] = cur._statement_type
assert seen["BEGIN WORK"] == seen["BEGIN"] == 34
assert seen["COMMIT WORK"] == seen["COMMIT"] == 35
assert seen["ROLLBACK WORK"] == seen["ROLLBACK"] == 36
assert set(seen.values()) == _TX_CONTROL_TYPES
def test_rollback_after_sql_begin_actually_rolls_back(
logged_db_params: ConnParams,
) -> None:
"""The data-loss case. rollback() reported success and sent nothing,
so the row it was asked to discard survived."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate")
cur.execute("CREATE TABLE t_txstate (k INT)")
try:
cur.execute("BEGIN WORK")
assert conn._in_transaction, "SQL BEGIN must set the flag"
cur.execute("INSERT INTO t_txstate VALUES (1)")
conn.rollback()
cur.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t_txstate")
assert cur.fetchone() == (0,), "rollback() was a silent no-op"
assert not conn._in_transaction
finally:
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate")
def test_sql_commit_clears_the_flag(logged_db_params: ConnParams) -> None:
"""The mirror image: with the flag stuck True after a SQL COMMIT, the
next rollback() would send SQ_RBWORK with no transaction open and
draw -255."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate2")
cur.execute("CREATE TABLE t_txstate2 (k INT)")
try:
cur.execute("BEGIN WORK")
cur.execute("INSERT INTO t_txstate2 VALUES (1)")
cur.execute("COMMIT WORK")
assert not conn._in_transaction, "SQL COMMIT must clear the flag"
conn.rollback() # must be a no-op, not a -255
cur.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t_txstate2")
assert cur.fetchone() == (1,), "the committed row must survive"
finally:
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate2")
def test_sql_begin_does_not_collide_with_the_implicit_one(
logged_db_params: ConnParams,
) -> None:
"""Non-autocommit. The driver's implicit SQ_BEGIN used to fire first
and the caller's BEGIN WORK then got -535."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=False) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate3")
conn.commit()
cur.execute("CREATE TABLE t_txstate3 (k INT)")
conn.commit()
try:
cur.execute("BEGIN WORK")
cur.execute("INSERT INTO t_txstate3 VALUES (1)")
conn.rollback()
cur.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t_txstate3")
assert cur.fetchone() == (0,)
conn.commit()
finally:
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate3")
conn.commit()
def test_ordinary_dml_still_opens_a_transaction(
logged_db_params: ConnParams,
) -> None:
"""_ensure_transaction moved from before the PREPARE to after the
describe. It still has to fire for everything that isn't transaction
control, or non-autocommit DML runs outside a transaction."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=False) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate4")
conn.commit()
cur.execute("CREATE TABLE t_txstate4 (k INT)")
conn.commit()
try:
assert not conn._in_transaction
cur.execute("INSERT INTO t_txstate4 VALUES (1)")
assert conn._in_transaction, "DML must open a transaction"
conn.rollback()
cur.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t_txstate4")
assert cur.fetchone() == (0,)
conn.commit()
finally:
with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
cur.execute("DROP TABLE t_txstate4")
conn.commit()
def test_a_failed_transaction_statement_does_not_move_the_flag(
logged_db_params: ConnParams,
) -> None:
"""The sync runs on the success path only. A COMMIT that the server
rejects has not ended anything."""
with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor()
assert not conn._in_transaction
with pytest.raises(informix_db.Error):
cur.execute("COMMIT WORK") # -255, nothing to commit
assert not conn._in_transaction
cur.execute("SELECT FIRST 1 tabid FROM systables")
assert cur.fetchone() is not None