"""Phase 7 integration tests — real transaction semantics on a logged DB.

These tests run against ``testdb`` (created with ``WITH LOG`` — see
``conftest.py::_ensure_testdb``). Without a logged database, ``COMMIT``
and ``ROLLBACK`` are no-ops, so the canonical "rolled-back insert is
invisible" test would silently lie.

The tests cover:
  - Autocommit on/off semantics
  - Single-connection commit visibility
  - Rollback isolation (the gate test from the original Phase 3 plan)
  - Cross-connection isolation (committed data visible to a fresh conn,
    uncommitted data not)
  - Multi-statement transactions
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import contextlib
from collections.abc import Iterator

import pytest

import informix_db
from tests.conftest import ConnParams

pytestmark = pytest.mark.integration


def _connect(params: ConnParams, *, autocommit: bool = False) -> informix_db.Connection:
    return informix_db.connect(
        host=params.host,
        port=params.port,
        user=params.user,
        password=params.password,
        database=params.database,
        server=params.server,
        connect_timeout=10.0,
        read_timeout=10.0,
        autocommit=autocommit,
    )


@pytest.fixture
def fresh_table(logged_db_params: ConnParams) -> Iterator[str]:
    """Create a fresh test table per test and drop it on teardown.

    Uses a permanent table (not TEMP) because TEMP tables are session-
    scoped and don't participate in cross-connection isolation tests.
    """
    table = "t_txn_test"
    with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
            cur.execute(f"DROP TABLE {table}")
        cur.execute(f"CREATE TABLE {table} (id INTEGER, label VARCHAR(64))")
    try:
        yield table
    finally:
        with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
            cur = conn.cursor()
            with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
                cur.execute(f"DROP TABLE {table}")


# -------- Commit + rollback ---------------------------------------------


def test_committed_insert_persists(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """Canonical commit test: COMMIT makes data permanent."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "alpha")
        )
        conn.commit()
        cur.execute(f"SELECT id, label FROM {fresh_table}")
        assert cur.fetchall() == [(1, "alpha")]


def test_rollback_hides_insert(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """Canonical rollback test (the Phase 3 gate test).

    A rolled-back INSERT must be invisible to subsequent SELECTs in the
    same session. This is the load-bearing transaction guarantee.
    """
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "alpha")
        )
        conn.rollback()
        cur.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {fresh_table}")
        (count,) = cur.fetchone()
        assert int(count) == 0


def test_rollback_after_multiple_inserts(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """ROLLBACK reverts ALL pending statements, not just the most recent."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.executemany(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)",
            [(1, "a"), (2, "b"), (3, "c"), (4, "d")],
        )
        conn.rollback()
        cur.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {fresh_table}")
        (count,) = cur.fetchone()
        assert int(count) == 0


def test_partial_commit_then_rollback(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """Committed data stays; subsequent uncommitted data rolls back cleanly."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        # Phase 1: commit some rows
        cur.executemany(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)",
            [(1, "kept-a"), (2, "kept-b")],
        )
        conn.commit()

        # Phase 2: insert more, but roll back
        cur.executemany(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)",
            [(3, "lost-a"), (4, "lost-b")],
        )
        conn.rollback()

        cur.execute(
            f"SELECT id, label FROM {fresh_table} ORDER BY id"
        )
        assert cur.fetchall() == [(1, "kept-a"), (2, "kept-b")]


# -------- Autocommit ---------------------------------------------------


def test_autocommit_persists_without_explicit_commit(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """With autocommit=True, no explicit commit() is needed."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "auto")
        )
        # No conn.commit() call — autocommit handles it

    # Verify in a fresh connection that the row is durable
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(f"SELECT id, label FROM {fresh_table}")
        assert cur.fetchall() == [(1, "auto")]


def test_autocommit_rollback_is_noop(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """In autocommit mode, rollback() can't undo already-committed work.

    DB-API 2.0 spec is silent on the exact behavior here, but the
    pragmatic behavior is that rollback() in autocommit mode is a no-op
    — there's no open transaction to roll back. The data persists.
    """
    with _connect(logged_db_params, autocommit=True) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "x")
        )
        # Try to roll back — should be a no-op since each statement
        # was already committed. Some drivers raise; either is OK.
        with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
            conn.rollback()

        cur.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {fresh_table}")
        (count,) = cur.fetchone()
        assert int(count) == 1


# -------- Cross-connection isolation -----------------------------------


def test_committed_data_visible_to_fresh_connection(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """Committed writes in conn A are durably visible to a fresh conn B.

    This is the "data is durable across connection boundaries"
    guarantee. We don't test the *uncommitted-invisible* direction
    here because Informix's default isolation level (Committed Read
    with row-level locking) makes conn B *block* on uncommitted writes
    rather than reading zero — which surfaces as -252 lock-timeout
    errors that depend on `lock mode wait` config rather than on
    transaction semantics. The blocking behavior is correct; testing
    it here would just be testing Informix's lock manager.
    """
    conn_a = _connect(logged_db_params)
    try:
        cur_a = conn_a.cursor()
        cur_a.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "writer")
        )
        conn_a.commit()
    finally:
        conn_a.close()

    # Fresh connection — should see the committed row
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn_b:
        cur_b = conn_b.cursor()
        cur_b.execute(f"SELECT id, label FROM {fresh_table}")
        assert cur_b.fetchall() == [(1, "writer")]


# -------- Mixed DML + sanity -------------------------------------------


def test_update_inside_transaction(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """UPDATE within a transaction is reverted by ROLLBACK."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "original")
        )
        conn.commit()

        # Update + roll back
        cur.execute(
            f"UPDATE {fresh_table} SET label = ? WHERE id = ?",
            ("modified", 1),
        )
        conn.rollback()

        cur.execute(f"SELECT label FROM {fresh_table} WHERE id = ?", (1,))
        assert cur.fetchone() == ("original",)


def test_delete_inside_transaction(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """DELETE within a transaction is reverted by ROLLBACK."""
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()
        cur.executemany(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)",
            [(1, "a"), (2, "b"), (3, "c")],
        )
        conn.commit()

        cur.execute(f"DELETE FROM {fresh_table} WHERE id = ?", (2,))
        conn.rollback()

        cur.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {fresh_table}")
        (count,) = cur.fetchone()
        assert int(count) == 3


def test_implicit_transaction_per_dml(
    logged_db_params: ConnParams, fresh_table: str
) -> None:
    """The driver implicitly opens a transaction on each DML.

    Users don't need (and shouldn't use) ``BEGIN WORK`` in SQL —
    the driver sends ``SQ_BEGIN`` automatically before the first DML
    in non-autocommit mode. After ``commit()``, the next DML opens
    a fresh transaction. This test verifies the round-trip of two
    independent transactions on the same connection.
    """
    with _connect(logged_db_params) as conn:
        cur = conn.cursor()

        # Transaction 1
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (1, "txn-1")
        )
        conn.commit()

        # Transaction 2 — completely separate, opens fresh BEGIN
        cur.execute(
            f"INSERT INTO {fresh_table} VALUES (?, ?)", (2, "txn-2")
        )
        conn.commit()

        cur.execute(f"SELECT id, label FROM {fresh_table} ORDER BY id")
        assert cur.fetchall() == [(1, "txn-1"), (2, "txn-2")]