Cospas-Sarsat specification summaries moved to reference/ for internal use only. Links updated to point to official cospas-sarsat.int site. The extracted images remain in public/ for use in other pages.
2291 lines
60 KiB
Markdown
2291 lines
60 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "T013: Cospas-Sarsat Geosar Space Segment Commissioning Standard C"
|
||
description: "Official Cospas-Sarsat T-series document T013"
|
||
sidebar:
|
||
badge:
|
||
text: "T"
|
||
variant: "note"
|
||
# Extended Cospas-Sarsat metadata
|
||
documentId: "T013"
|
||
series: "T"
|
||
seriesName: "Technical"
|
||
documentType: "specification"
|
||
isLatest: true
|
||
issue: 1
|
||
revision: 3
|
||
documentDate: "March 2021"
|
||
originalTitle: "Cospas-Sarsat Geosar Space Segment"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
> **📋 Document Information**
|
||
>
|
||
> **Series:** T-Series (Technical)
|
||
> **Version:** Issue 1 - Revision 3
|
||
> **Date:** March 2021
|
||
> **Source:** [Cospas-Sarsat Official Documents](https://www.cospas-sarsat.int/en/documents-pro/system-documents)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# T013 - T013-MAR-26-2021.pdf
|
||
|
||
**Pages:** 38
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
COSPAS-SARSAT GEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT
|
||
COMMISSIONING STANDARD
|
||
|
||
|
||
C/S T.013
|
||
Issue 1 - Revision 3
|
||
|
||
|
||
COSPAS-SARSAT GEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT
|
||
COMMISSIONING STANDARD
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
History
|
||
|
||
|
||
Issue Revision
|
||
Date
|
||
|
||
Revised Page(s)
|
||
|
||
Comments
|
||
|
||
Oct 2001
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Approved by CSC-27
|
||
|
||
|
||
Oct 2012
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Approved by CSC-49
|
||
|
||
|
||
Oct 2013
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Approved by CSC-51
|
||
|
||
|
||
Mar 2021
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Approved by CSC-64
|
||
|
||
|
||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.
|
||
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1-1
|
||
|
||
1.1
|
||
Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1-1
|
||
|
||
1.2
|
||
Scope .......................................................................................................... 1-1
|
||
|
||
1.3
|
||
Reference Documents ................................................................................. 1-2
|
||
|
||
1.4
|
||
Common System Units ............................................................................... 1-3
|
||
|
||
2.
|
||
ON-ORBIT SPACE SEGMENT TESTING AND COMMISSIONING ........... 2-1
|
||
|
||
2.1
|
||
Initial On-orbit Tests .................................................................................. 2-1
|
||
|
||
2.2
|
||
Commissioning Procedure .......................................................................... 2-2
|
||
|
||
2.3
|
||
Satellite System Data .................................................................................. 2-3
|
||
|
||
2.4
|
||
Periodic Tests ............................................................................................. 2-3
|
||
|
||
2.5
|
||
Routine Monitoring of the Space Segment................................................. 2-3
|
||
|
||
2.6
|
||
De-commissioning Procedure..................................................................... 2-4
|
||
|
||
2.7
|
||
Space Segment Status Reporting Procedures ............................................. 2-6
|
||
|
||
|
||
LIST OF FIGURES
|
||
|
||
Figure
|
||
Page
|
||
|
||
1.1
|
||
GEOSAR Space Segment Interfaces ........................................................................ 1-2
|
||
2.1
|
||
GEOSAR Payload Commissioning Procedure ......................................................... 2-5
|
||
2.2
|
||
GEOSAR Problem Reporting and Investigation Procedures ................................... 2-7
|
||
|
||
|
||
LIST OF TABLES
|
||
|
||
Table
|
||
Page
|
||
|
||
B.1
|
||
List of Post Launch Tests ........................................................................................ B-1
|
||
C.1
|
||
GOES Space Segment Assessment Indicators/Compliance Levels ........................ C-1
|
||
C.2
|
||
INSAT Space Segment Assessment Indicators/Compliance Levels ....................... C-2
|
||
C.3
|
||
Electro-L Space Segment Assessment Indicators/Compliance Levels ................... C-2
|
||
C.4
|
||
MSG Space Segment Assessment Indicators/Compliance Levels .......................... C-3
|
||
C.5
|
||
MTG Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels ........................ C-3
|
||
|
||
|
||
LIST OF ANNEXES
|
||
|
||
|
||
Page
|
||
|
||
Annex A:
|
||
List of Acronyms Used in C/S T.013 ............................................................. A-1
|
||
|
||
Annex B:
|
||
GEOSAR Space Segment Testing ................................................................. B-1
|
||
|
||
B.1 EIRP in SAR Channel ...................................................................... B-2
|
||
|
||
B.2 Spectral Occupancy of the Downlink .............................................. B-3
|
||
|
||
B.3 Spurious Output Levels .................................................................... B-3
|
||
|
||
B.4 G/T of 406 MHz Repeater................................................................ B-4
|
||
|
||
B.5 Channel Bandwidth and Amplitude Ripple ..................................... B-5
|
||
|
||
B.6 Downlink Carrier Frequency............................................................ B-7
|
||
|
||
B.7 ALC Dynamic Range ....................................................................... B-7
|
||
|
||
B.8 Modulation Index ............................................................................. B-9
|
||
|
||
B.9 Translation Frequencies ................................................................. B-10
|
||
|
||
B.10 Intermodulation Levels .................................................................. B-11
|
||
|
||
B.11 Beacon Signal Processing .............................................................. B-12
|
||
|
||
Annex C:
|
||
GEOSAR Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels ....... C-1
|
||
|
||
Annex D:
|
||
GEOSAR IOC Status Message ...................................................................... D-1
|
||
|
||
Annex E:
|
||
GEOSAR Commissioning Report .................................................................. E-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1-4
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.
|
||
INTRODUCTION
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.1
|
||
Purpose
|
||
|
||
This document defines the recommended tests, technical measurement standards and
|
||
procedures required for implementing on-orbit testing and commissioning of GEOSAR space
|
||
segment payloads. Use of these measurement standards for on-orbit testing of a GEOSAR
|
||
space segment will provide a standardised approach for determining the quality of the SAR
|
||
instrument performance. Commissioning is a formal declaration by the specific GEOSAR
|
||
commissioning authority (CA) that a SAR payload is operational with or without limitations.
|
||
De-commissioning is a formal declaration by the commissioning authority that a GEOSAR
|
||
SAR payload is no longer operational. The GEOSAR commissioning authority is normally the
|
||
country responsible for the launch, on orbit testing and operations of the GEOSAR satellite as
|
||
listed in document C/S T.011. However, a Cospas-Sarsat Participant may be the
|
||
commissioning authority for GEOSAR satellites provided by international organisations.
|
||
|
||
An additional objective of this document is to ensure that measurements of GEOSAR space
|
||
segment payload parameters are in accordance with a common set of test methods and
|
||
definitions, so that the results may be easily evaluated.
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.2
|
||
Scope
|
||
|
||
The following three phases of GEOSAR space segment on-orbit testing are addressed: initial
|
||
on-orbit testing, periodic testing, and routine monitoring. The basic responsibilities, specific
|
||
tests to be performed, and test methodologies are defined by this document.
|
||
|
||
Initial on-orbit tests are performed in order to establish that a GEOSAR payload can be placed
|
||
in service to support SAR operations. The initial tests focus on establishing that the GEOSAR
|
||
payload will properly interface and be interoperable with the ground segment as shown in
|
||
Figure 1.1. It should be noted, however, that GEOSAR space segment providers have
|
||
developed unique implementations of the GEOSAR payload. These implementations include
|
||
two fundamentally different designs. The GEOSAR payloads on the GOES, INSAT and
|
||
Electro-L spacecraft are demodulation/remodulation type repeaters using phase modulation.
|
||
The GEOSAR payloads on the MSG and MTG spacecraft are frequency translation type
|
||
repeaters.
|
||
|
||
If results of the initial on-orbit tests confirm that values for assessment indicators are within
|
||
accepted thresholds, the payload can be formally commissioned. The payload can then be used
|
||
operationally and data exchanged as described in document C/S A.001, Cospas-Sarsat Data
|
||
Distribution Plan.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1-4
|
||
|
||
|
||
Periodic tests to be performed year are also specified. These tests provide measurements used
|
||
to confirm continued on-orbit performance of the SAR payload.
|
||
|
||
A list of recommended tests and a description of each test is provided in Annex B. The test
|
||
descriptions provide sufficient detail to define the measurement method, but are not intended
|
||
to be specific test procedures. It is the responsibility of the commissioning authority to develop
|
||
test procedures that are traceable to the methods described in this document.
|
||
|
||
After initiation of GEOSAR operations, the space segment operator, GEOLUT operators and
|
||
MCC operators routinely monitor system performance as part of normal operations. The space
|
||
segment operator conducts routine monitoring of the on-orbit payload performance using
|
||
telemetry and other means as deemed necessary. GEOLUT and MCC operators can also detect
|
||
significant changes (e.g., loss of channel, etc.). Abnormal conditions detected by GEOLUT
|
||
and MCC operators are reported to the commissioning authority for further tests and corrective
|
||
action as required. If deemed necessary, operational limitations may be placed on the use of
|
||
the payload or it may be de-commissioned. With respect to the MSG and MTG SAR payloads,
|
||
the commissioning authority will advise EUMETSAT of any detected abnormal conditions,
|
||
and any required tests will be developed jointly by the commissioning authority and
|
||
EUMETSAT.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Figure 1.1: GEOSAR Space Segment Interfaces
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.3
|
||
Reference Documents
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
C/S A.001: Cospas-Sarsat Data Distribution Plan.
|
||
|
||
b. C/S A.003: Cospas-Sarsat System Monitoring and Reporting.
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
C/S G.003: Introduction to the Cospas-Sarsat System.
|
||
406 MHz Distress
|
||
Beacons
|
||
GEOSAR
|
||
406 MHz
|
||
Repeater*
|
||
*Unique configuration for
|
||
each GEOSAR spacecraft
|
||
GEOLUT
|
||
Space Segment
|
||
Operator
|
||
|
||
Telemetry and
|
||
Commanding
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1-4
|
||
|
||
|
||
d. C/S R.006: Demonstration and Evaluation Plan for 406 MHz GEOSAR Systems.
|
||
|
||
e.
|
||
C/S T.001: Specification for Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz Distress Beacons.
|
||
|
||
f.
|
||
C/S T.009: Cospas-Sarsat GEOLUT Performance Specification and Design
|
||
Guidelines.
|
||
|
||
g. C/S T.011: Description of the 406 MHz Payloads Used in the Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
GEOSAR System.
|
||
|
||
|
||
1.4
|
||
Common System Units
|
||
|
||
The System International (SI) units of measurement will be used for exchange of
|
||
interoperability parameters and test results.
|
||
|
||
Interpretation of technical terms in exchanged documentation will be in accordance with the
|
||
latest edition of the "IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronic Terms".
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF SECTION 1 –
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.
|
||
ON-ORBIT SPACE SEGMENT TESTING AND COMMISSIONING
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.1
|
||
Initial On-orbit Tests
|
||
|
||
Following the launch of each new satellite, the responsible commissioning authority conducts
|
||
initial on-orbit tests to confirm that the GEOSAR payload is functioning within the
|
||
performance range as specified in C/S T.011. The initial on-orbit tests to be conducted and the
|
||
associated test methods are listed in Annex B. The GEOSAR space segment commissioning
|
||
authorities are identified below.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Spacecraft
|
||
|
||
Space Segment Operator
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
|
||
|
||
GOES
|
||
|
||
|
||
USA
|
||
|
||
|
||
USA
|
||
|
||
Electro-L
|
||
|
||
|
||
Russia
|
||
|
||
|
||
Russia
|
||
|
||
Insat
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
India
|
||
|
||
|
||
India
|
||
|
||
MSG
|
||
|
||
|
||
EUMETSAT
|
||
|
||
France
|
||
MTG
|
||
|
||
|
||
EUMETSAT
|
||
|
||
France
|
||
|
||
The data from the initial on-orbit tests will be used to establish baseline values of system
|
||
parameters and to ensure assessment indicators are within previously established limits or to
|
||
establish new limit values. The assessment indicators are identified in Annex C.
|
||
|
||
Some of the tests require beacon signal processing similar to that done by GEOLUTs in order
|
||
to establish end-to-end performance. GEOSAR commissioning authorities that do not have
|
||
this capability can request assistance in conducting these tests from a GEOLUT operator
|
||
located in the repeater coverage area.
|
||
|
||
It is the responsibility of each commissioning authority to develop the procedures unique to the
|
||
satellite and test facility for conducting tests on the GEOSAR instrument. Such procedures
|
||
shall be traceable to the methods described in this document. Alternate methods can be
|
||
considered but must be described in detail with the test result documentation provided with the
|
||
commissioning report. In addition, other Participants may perform tests on the GEOSAR
|
||
instrument. However, these tests shall conform to the methods described herein and the test
|
||
procedures shall be provided to the responsible space segment operator beforehand to ensure
|
||
the safety of the GEOSAR spacecraft. Furthermore, all Participants conducting tests shall
|
||
conduct appropriate co-ordination within Cospas-Sarsat to ensure that there is no negative
|
||
impact on Cospas-Sarsat operations.
|
||
|
||
The initial on-orbit tests provide a set of baseline values for the assessment indicators at the
|
||
time the satellite begins operations. The baseline values can be compared with pre-launch data
|
||
to determine if on-orbit operation is nominal at launch, and with results from subsequent on-
|
||
orbit tests to monitor on-going performance trends.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
The commissioning authority will analyse the initial on-orbit test data and prepare a post launch
|
||
test report. The report will include the results of the tests along with a description of the test
|
||
methods sufficient to allow interpretation of the data. The test report shall be provided to the
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat as an attachment to the commissioning report.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.2
|
||
Commissioning Procedure
|
||
|
||
Commissioning is a formal declaration by the commissioning authority that the on-orbit
|
||
GEOSAR instrument assessment indicators meet the required compliance levels and that the
|
||
equipment is operational as part of the GEOSAR system. Commissioning may be declared
|
||
with operational limitations if some compliance levels are not met and limited operation is
|
||
deemed feasible. In such a case the status of the GEOSAR instrument is designated as being
|
||
at “limited operational capability” (LOC).
|
||
|
||
Performing the initial on-orbit tests and preparing a report may be time consuming. During
|
||
this time valid operational data will normally be available from the satellite payload that is
|
||
under test. In view of this, an initial operational capability (IOC) status may be declared for
|
||
the payload before the commissioning report is completed. This may be done at the option of
|
||
the commissioning authority after sufficient tests have been conducted to establish confidence
|
||
that use of the GEOSAR data will not cause unnecessary expenditure of SAR resources.
|
||
|
||
Satellite payload IOC is declared with a SIT 605 message issued on behalf of the
|
||
commissioning authority by the MCC associated with the commissioning authority. The
|
||
information to be included in the SIT 605 IOC message is detailed at Annex D. Once declared,
|
||
IOC status shall remain in effect until commissioning is completed which shall normally be no
|
||
more than 90 days after IOC status was declared. For the first MSG SAR payload (MSG-1),
|
||
IOC will last approximately 6 months, and will not be completed until all the other satellite
|
||
instruments (e.g. SAR and non-SAR instruments) have been fully commissioned.
|
||
|
||
Commissioning an on-orbit GEOSAR instrument consists of confirming the basic health and
|
||
safety of the payload and the measurement and analysis of post launch test data to verify
|
||
compliance or non-compliance with the expected values of the assessment indicators.
|
||
Figure 2.1 shows the general commissioning procedure. Upon completion of all tests, the
|
||
commissioning authority will evaluate the assessment indicators and prepare a commissioning
|
||
report as shown in Annex E. The commissioning report will designate the status of the
|
||
GEOSAR instrument as either being either at full operational capability (FOC) or limited
|
||
operational capability (LOC). The commissioning report shall be distributed by the MCC
|
||
associated with the commissioning authority to all MCCs in the Cospas-Sarsat system using a
|
||
SIT 605 message issued on behalf of the commissioning authority.
|
||
|
||
The commissioning authority shall provide a copy of the commissioning report to the Cospas-
|
||
Sarsat Secretariat for permanent retention. In the case of the MSG and MTG SAR payloads,
|
||
the commissioning authority will provide copies of all test results and commissioning reports
|
||
to EUMETSAT. The Secretariat will provide copies of the report to Cospas-Sarsat Participants
|
||
upon request.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.3
|
||
Satellite System Data
|
||
|
||
In order for Cospas-Sarsat to operate the GEOSAR system at either an IOC, LOC or FOC
|
||
status, the GEOSAR space segment operator shall provide the MCC associated with the
|
||
commissioning authority with the satellite/payload information necessary for conducting daily
|
||
operations. This MCC shall distribute the information to GEOLUT operators in accordance
|
||
with Cospas-Sarsat data distribution procedures as specified in document C/S A.001.
|
||
Examples of such data are satellite ephemeris and status messages as needed to inform Cospas-
|
||
Sarsat about the state of the GEOSAR instrument. The distribution of satellite ephemeris,
|
||
which may precede declaration of IOC status, shall not in itself be taken as a declaration of
|
||
IOC status.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.4
|
||
Periodic Tests
|
||
|
||
Periodic technical tests shall be performed yearly on each on-orbit GEOSAR instrument by the
|
||
commissioning authority to confirm that the assessment indicators remain within the accepted
|
||
limits and that the GEOSAR system under evaluation does not adversely affect SAR services.
|
||
The data obtained from periodic testing can also be used to provide trend data for forecasting
|
||
satellite operations and projecting the remaining life of the GEOSAR payload. The specific
|
||
periodic tests to be conducted for each payload are listed at Annex B.
|
||
|
||
A copy of all test results shall be provided to the Secretariat for permanent retention. In the
|
||
case of the MSG and MTG payloads, the commissioning authority will provide copies of the
|
||
test results to EUMETSAT. Should the results of the periodic tests indicate a problem with the
|
||
SAR payload then the appropriate course of action described in section 2.7 should be followed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.5
|
||
Routine Monitoring of the Space Segment
|
||
|
||
Routine monitoring of the space segment shall be performed by the space segment operator, as
|
||
well as GEOLUT and MCC operators. By monitoring the satellite telemetry information the
|
||
space segment operator might be able to identify potential problems before they impact on SAR
|
||
services. GEOLUT operators are able to identify problems by noting changes in GEOLUT
|
||
performance (e.g., satellite tracking performance or number of processing anomalies
|
||
generated), whereas MCC operators might be able to identify problems by comparing the alerts
|
||
produced by the GEOSAR system with information concerning distress events obtained from
|
||
other sources.
|
||
|
||
All problems or potential problems with the payload detected by either a space segment,
|
||
GEOLUT, or an MCC operator shall be reported to the applicable commissioning authority.
|
||
In the case of the MSG and MTG SAR payloads, the commissioning authority will advise
|
||
EUMETSAT of all / any problems, and actions proposed to investigate the matter. The
|
||
commissioning authority shall then conduct tests to confirm the health of the payload. Should
|
||
these tests indicate a problem with the SAR payload then the appropriate course of action
|
||
described in section 2.7 shall be followed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.6
|
||
De-commissioning Procedure
|
||
|
||
De-commissioning is a formal declaration by the GEOSAR commissioning authority that a
|
||
GEOSAR payload is no longer a part of the GEOSAR system. A GEOSAR instrument that
|
||
cannot meet the performance requirements for reliable Cospas-Sarsat service will be de-
|
||
commissioned. An operational GEOSAR instrument may also be de-commissioned by the
|
||
space segment operator due to general spacecraft health and safety issues. In this case, the
|
||
spacecraft operator shall notify the commissioning authority that the SAR instrument should
|
||
be de-commissioned. The commissioning authority would be responsible for distributing this
|
||
information via the MCC network, and providing a copy to the Secretariat for permanent
|
||
retention. A de-commissioned payload can later be re-commissioned, with or without
|
||
limitations, based on an evaluation of current values of the assessment indicators and the need
|
||
within Cospas-Sarsat.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
Space Segment
|
||
Operator Launches
|
||
Satellite
|
||
Commissioning
|
||
Authority Conducts
|
||
Commissioning Tests
|
||
Tests Indicate
|
||
Payload Adversely Affects
|
||
SAR Operations?
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Declares Payload at Initial
|
||
Operational Capability (IOC)
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Prepares and Reviews
|
||
Commissioning Report
|
||
Payload Fully
|
||
Satisfies Commissioning
|
||
Requirements?
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Declares Payload at Full
|
||
Operational Capability
|
||
(FOC)
|
||
Payload Satisfies
|
||
Requirements for Limited
|
||
Operational Capability
|
||
(LOC)?
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Declares Payload at LOC,
|
||
and Indicates Limitations or
|
||
Special GEOLUT
|
||
Processing Requirements
|
||
Commissioning
|
||
Authority and Space
|
||
Segment Operator
|
||
Investigate Situation
|
||
Secretariat Prepares Updates
|
||
to System Documents
|
||
GEOLUT Operators Process
|
||
and Distribute Alert Data from
|
||
GEOSAR Payload
|
||
Yes
|
||
No
|
||
Yes
|
||
No
|
||
No
|
||
Yes
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
The MSG and MTG Payload Commissioning Authority will provide EUMETSAT copies of all
|
||
Payload test results and reports.
|
||
Figure 2.1: GEOSAR Payload Commissioning Procedure
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.7
|
||
Space Segment Problem Reporting and Investigation Procedures
|
||
|
||
Any space segment, GEOLUT or MCC operator that detects anomalies of a GEOSAR
|
||
instrument during routine monitoring or system operation shall inform the relevant
|
||
commissioning authority so that special tests can be conducted and possible corrective action
|
||
(e.g., switch to backup payload, etc.) taken. GEOLUT and MCC operators will report problems
|
||
to the responsible commissioning authority through the associated MCC in accordance with
|
||
procedures given in C/S A.001, and space segment operators shall report anomalies to the
|
||
commissioning authority via the most effective means available.
|
||
|
||
Upon being made aware of a possible problem with the GEOSAR payload, the commissioning
|
||
authority shall advise the space segment operator, and conduct an investigation to evaluate the
|
||
status and performance of the instrument. Based on the results of the investigation, the
|
||
commissioning authority shall take one of the courses of action described below.
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Should the investigation identify a serious problem with the payload which
|
||
renders it unusable for SAR purposes, the commissioning authority shall de-
|
||
commission the payload in accordance with section 2.6.
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Should the investigation identify a problem which confirms degraded payload
|
||
performance, but indicates that the instrument is still useful for SAR purposes,
|
||
the commissioning authority shall distribute an update of the payload status via
|
||
the MCC network, with a copy also provided to the Secretariat and to the space
|
||
segment operator. The update shall specifically identify:
|
||
|
||
-
|
||
the problem with the payload;
|
||
|
||
-
|
||
the impact on GEOLUT processing;
|
||
|
||
-
|
||
the impact on the quality of distress alerts produced; and
|
||
|
||
-
|
||
any special GEOLUT processing required.
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Should the investigation not confirm the problem or conclude that there is a
|
||
problem which does not impact on GEOSAR performance, the commissioning
|
||
authority shall liaise with the organisation which identified the problem to
|
||
confirm that GEOSAR performance is not affected. A copy of the conclusions
|
||
shall also be provided to the Secretariat for retention. There would be no
|
||
requirement to advise other Cospas-Sarsat Participants of the results of the
|
||
investigation in such a circumstance.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
Potential Payload
|
||
Problem Identified to
|
||
Commissioning
|
||
Authority
|
||
Commissioning
|
||
Authority Conducts
|
||
Investigation to
|
||
Evaluate Problem
|
||
Investigation
|
||
Confirms that a Payload
|
||
Problem Exists?
|
||
Problem
|
||
Renders the Payload
|
||
Unusable for SAR?
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Decommissions Payload
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Provides Payload Update
|
||
Status and Additional
|
||
Guidance via MCC Network
|
||
Commissioning Authority
|
||
Advises the Organisation/
|
||
Participant which Filed the
|
||
Problem Report and the
|
||
Secretariat of the Results
|
||
No
|
||
Yes
|
||
No
|
||
Yes
|
||
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
The MSG and MTG Payload Commissioning Authority will provide EUMETSAT copies of all
|
||
Payload test results and reports.
|
||
|
||
Figure 2.2: GEOSAR Problem Reporting and Investigation Procedures
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF SECTION 2 -
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEXES TO THE DOCUMENT
|
||
GEOSAR
|
||
SPACE SEGMENT
|
||
COMMISSIONING STANDARD
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEX A
|
||
|
||
|
||
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED IN C/S T.013
|
||
|
||
AGC .................. automatic gain control
|
||
ALC.................... automatic level control
|
||
|
||
BW .................... bandwidth
|
||
|
||
C/N ..................... carrier-to-noise power ratio
|
||
C/No ................... carrier-to-noise density ratio
|
||
cw ....................... continuous wave
|
||
|
||
dB ....................... decibel
|
||
dBHz ................. decibel relative to one Hertz
|
||
dBm ................... decibel above one milliwatt
|
||
dBW .................... decibel above one Watt
|
||
|
||
EIRP .................. equivalent isotropically radiated power
|
||
EOC.................... edge of coverage
|
||
|
||
fc ......................... carrier frequency
|
||
FOC…………….full operational capability
|
||
FOV.................... field of view
|
||
|
||
GEOLUT............ LUT in a GEOSAR system
|
||
GEOSAR............ geostationary satellite system for search and rescue
|
||
GOES ................. Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite
|
||
G/T .................... gain-to-noise temperature ratio
|
||
|
||
IF ........................ intermediate frequency
|
||
INSAT ................ Indian National Satellite
|
||
IOC ..................... interim operational capability
|
||
|
||
K ......................... Kelvin
|
||
k.......................... Boltzmann's constant
|
||
kHz .................... kilohertz
|
||
|
||
LOC ……………limited operational capability
|
||
LNA ................... low noise amplifier
|
||
|
||
MHz .................. megahertz
|
||
ms ...................... milliseconds
|
||
MSG ................... Meteosat Second Generation
|
||
MTG ................... Meteosat Third Generation
|
||
mW .................... milliwatt
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
A-2
|
||
|
||
|
||
No ....................... noise power spectral density
|
||
|
||
|
||
PDVM ................ probability of detecting a valid message.
|
||
|
||
RBW .................. resolution bandwidth
|
||
RHCP ................ right hand circular polarisation
|
||
|
||
SAR .................... search and rescue
|
||
S/No ................... signal-to-noise density ratio
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
-END OF ANNEX A-
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-1
|
||
|
||
March 2021
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEX B
|
||
|
||
|
||
GEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT TESTING
|
||
|
||
|
||
The table below identifies the minimum set of post launch tests to be completed by the space
|
||
segment operator in order to establish initial commissioning of a GEOSAR payload. Each
|
||
space segment operator is also encouraged to conduct other tests that may more fully
|
||
characterise payload performance. Selected tests are repeated yearly.
|
||
|
||
Table B.1:
|
||
List of Post Launch Tests
|
||
|
||
|
||
Parameter Tested
|
||
GOES
|
||
INSAT MSG Electro-L
|
||
MTG
|
||
B.1
|
||
Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power
|
||
(EIRP) in SAR Channel
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
B.2
|
||
Spectral Occupancy of the Downlink
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.3
|
||
Spurious Output Levels
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.4
|
||
G/T of the 406 MHz Repeater
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
B.5
|
||
Channel Bandwidth and Amplitude Ripple
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
B.6
|
||
Downlink Carrier Frequency
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
B.7
|
||
ALC Dynamic Range
|
||
|
||
|
||
N/A
|
||
N/A
|
||
N/A
|
||
B.8
|
||
Modulation Index
|
||
|
||
|
||
N/A
|
||
|
||
N/A
|
||
B.9
|
||
Translation Frequencies
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
1,2
|
||
B.10
|
||
Intermodulation and Harmonic Levels
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.11
|
||
Beacon signal processing
|
||
|
||
|
||
Notes: 1. Commissioning test.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. This test is also performed periodically at yearly intervals.
|
||
|
||
The following pages of this annex provide a general description of each test. It should be noted,
|
||
however, that each space segment operator has developed a unique implementation of the
|
||
GEOSAR payload. These implementations include two fundamentally different designs. The
|
||
GEOSAR payloads on the GOES Electro-L and INSAT spacecraft are remodulation type
|
||
repeaters using phase modulation. The GEOSAR payload on the MSG and MTG spacecraft
|
||
are frequency translation type repeaters. It is the responsibility of each commissioning
|
||
authority, in co-operation with the space segment operator, to develop detailed procedures
|
||
unique to his ground test facility for conducting these tests. Such procedures where possible
|
||
shall be traceable to the methods described in this document. Alternate methods can be
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-2
|
||
|
||
|
||
considered but must be agreed to in advance by the space segment operator and described in
|
||
detail by the commissioning authority as part of the post launch test report.
|
||
|
||
The performance parameters to be measured by these tests and their values are listed in
|
||
Annex C as assessment indicators.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.1
|
||
EIRP IN SAR CHANNEL
|
||
|
||
B.1.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the SAR instrument downlink equivalent isotropically
|
||
radiated power (EIRP). The measured value will be compared with the level specified in the
|
||
Description of the 406 MHz Payloads Used in the Cospas-Sarsat System, C/S T.011. The test
|
||
should be conducted for each operational mode and redundancy configuration.
|
||
|
||
B.1.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The general procedure to be adopted for remodulation repeaters (e.g., GOES and INSAT
|
||
payloads) for determining the EIRP is to command the phase modulation off and measure the
|
||
downlink carrier level at the ground receiving station. With the phase modulation off the total
|
||
power is in the carrier. A common technique is to measure the C/No(dn) at an IF point in the
|
||
receiving ground station. A spectrum analyser is the preferred instrument for use in making
|
||
the measurement. The EIRP is then derived using the following link equation.
|
||
|
||
EIRP = C/No(dn) - G/T(gs) + Lpath + Lpol + k (dBm)
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
|
||
|
||
C = SAR instrument downlink carrier at the receiving station (dBm)
|
||
|
||
|
||
No(dn) = noise power spectral density at the ground receiving system. The SAR
|
||
transponder up-link noise is not included in No(dn) since the phase
|
||
modulation is turned off. (dBm/Hz)
|
||
|
||
|
||
G/T(gs) = receiving station antenna gain to system noise temperature ratio. (dB/K)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Lpath = free space path loss from the satellite to the ground station. (dB)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Lpol =
|
||
loss due to polarisation mismatch between the ground receive antenna and
|
||
the satellite antenna. (dB)
|
||
|
||
|
||
k =
|
||
Boltzmann's constant = -198.6 (dBm/Hz-K)
|
||
|
||
Measure the downlink received C/N in the ground receiver IF using a spectrum analyser
|
||
resolution bandwidth setting such that C/N 20 dB. The value read for C can then be taken to
|
||
be entirely due to the carrier since the carrier power is 100 times the noise power. Position the
|
||
analyser marker away from the carrier for making the No(dn) measurement. No(dn), and
|
||
possibly C/No(dn), can be measured directly using the spectrum analyser if it has an automatic
|
||
noise density-measuring feature. If not, the noise power, N, in the resolution bandwidth can
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-3
|
||
|
||
|
||
be converted to No(dn) by applying the bandwidth correction plus any other correction factors
|
||
specified for the analyser.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.2
|
||
SPECTRAL OCCUPANCY OF THE DOWNLINK
|
||
|
||
B.2.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the spectral occupancy of the downlink spectrum in
|
||
order to identify normal in-band operation and the presence of any out-of-band emissions. The
|
||
test must be performed separately in each operating mode of the SAR instrument.
|
||
|
||
B.2.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The downlink spectrum in a 1 MHz band centred on the downlink carrier is measured using a
|
||
spectrum analyser connected in the ground receiver 1st IF ahead of any narrow band filtering
|
||
and the phase demodulator. A spectrum analyser resolution bandwidth of 1 kHz or lower is
|
||
recommended. The measurement should be made if possible during a period when no
|
||
406 MHz band interfering signals are being received and retransmitted by the spacecraft.
|
||
Several plots of the measured spectrum should be taken, particularly if abnormal performance
|
||
is suspected. Sufficient calibration data must be provided in order to relate the measured carrier
|
||
component to the spacecraft output (using link budget). The test should be repeated in a 2 MHz
|
||
band centred on the downlink carrier.
|
||
|
||
The spectrum is analysed for the presence of any anomalous spectral emissions. Since there is
|
||
very little Doppler frequency variation associated with geostationary satellites, signals that
|
||
constantly appear in the spectrum at fixed frequencies are due to either on board
|
||
electromagnetic interference (EMI) or external interference. The source of any observed
|
||
signals may possibly be determined by comparing spectral plots taken at various times
|
||
throughout the day or over a number of days. Data from the LEOSAR system may also be
|
||
used to assist in identifying signals that originate from external sources.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.3
|
||
SPURIOUS OUTPUT LEVELS
|
||
|
||
B.3.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to determine the frequency and level referred to the receiver input
|
||
of any spurious signals within the GEOSAR repeater bandwidth.
|
||
|
||
B.3.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
Spurious signals within the repeater bandwidth can be monitored in the demodulated baseband
|
||
spectrum using a spectrum analyser. These measurements should be made as accurately as
|
||
possible; therefore, they should be made with as small a resolution bandwidth as practical
|
||
( 100Hz). The baseband is approximately 100 kHz and a FFT type spectrum analyser, if
|
||
available, is a good choice for the measurement instrument. Care must be exercised in
|
||
identifying spurious signals generated by on-board equipment. The signals are in general at a
|
||
constant frequency; however, since there is very little GEOSAR Doppler shift associated with
|
||
terrestrially emitted signals in the 406 MHz band these signals also will appear at a constant
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-4
|
||
|
||
|
||
frequency. It may be necessary to take several spectrum plots over a number of days to assist
|
||
in identifying on-board signals from terrestrial emitters. The test personnel can also ask for
|
||
assistance from LEOLUT operators in identifying terrestrial emitters. The LEOSAR spacecraft
|
||
can identify these signals due to the Doppler at the LEOSAR spacecraft.
|
||
|
||
The frequency of any in-band spurious signals can be read using the spectrum analyser marker
|
||
controls. The level of spurious signals at the receiver input can be estimated by transmitting a
|
||
known reference signal to the satellite to compare against the spurious signal. The reference
|
||
signal should be within a few kilohertz of the signal and can be adjusted to match the spurious
|
||
signal level. However, care must be taken to not overload the repeater. The level of the
|
||
reference signal at the receiver input can be estimated by performing a link calculation.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.4
|
||
G/T OF THE 406 MHz REPEATER
|
||
|
||
B.4.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the 406 MHz SAR receiver antenna gain-to-noise
|
||
temperature ratio, G/T(406). The measured value will be compared with the level specified in
|
||
C/S T.011, “Description of the 406 MHz Payloads Used in the Cospas-Sarsat GEOSAR
|
||
System”. The test should be conducted for each available GEOSAR receive antenna and LNA
|
||
configuration (redundant channels, etc.).
|
||
|
||
B.4.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The LNA gain on GEOSAR instruments is large enough so that the G/T is established by the
|
||
antenna and LNA combination. Therefore, the measurement can be made in either the
|
||
wideband or narrow band mode.
|
||
|
||
The on orbit G/T(406) can be derived by using the following link equation.
|
||
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
k
|
||
L
|
||
L
|
||
up
|
||
EIRP
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
G
|
||
pol
|
||
path
|
||
o
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
−
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
o
|
||
= carrier to noise density ratio in the SAR repeater. (dBHz-1)
|
||
EIRP(up) = known up-link EIRP. (dBm)
|
||
Lpath = up-link free space path loss. (dB)
|
||
Lpol
|
||
= polarisation mismatch loss between the up-link antenna and the satellite
|
||
receive antenna. (dB)
|
||
K
|
||
= Boltzmann's constant = -198.6 (dBm/Hz-K)
|
||
|
||
C/No(up) is calculated from the overall C/No(total) measured at the ground test facility by
|
||
subtracting out the ground station receiver noise. The No (total) observed at the ground station
|
||
consists of two parts; No (total) = No (up) + No (gs) where No (gs) is the ground station receiver
|
||
noise. No (gs) can be measured by pointing the ground station antenna away from the GEOSAR
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-5
|
||
|
||
|
||
spacecraft but not in the beam width of stellar sources emitting high radio frequency energy
|
||
levels.
|
||
|
||
The general procedure is as follows.
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Up-link a known EIRP (40 dBm) at 406.025 MHz.
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Monitor the received signal using a spectrum analyser. This can be done after
|
||
demodulation and/or filtering to baseband. Adjust ground station antenna
|
||
azimuth and elevation to maximise the received level. Set analyser resolution
|
||
bandwidth such that C/N (total) 20 dB. Measure values of C/No(total), C, and
|
||
No (total). The noise spectral density values can be measured directly using the
|
||
spectrum analyser if it has an automatic noise density measuring feature. If not,
|
||
the noise power, N(total) measured in the analyser resolution bandwidth can be
|
||
converted to No(total) by applying the bandwidth correction plus any other
|
||
correction factors specified for the analyser.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Adjust the ground station antenna pointing such that it points away from
|
||
GEOSAR by at least 15 but not in the field of view (FOV) of stellar sources
|
||
emitting high radio frequency energy levels. Measure the clear sky ground
|
||
station receiver noise, No (gs).
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Compute No (up) = No (total) - No (gs) and use the value to determine C/No(up)
|
||
|
||
(convert as needed between numerics and dB).
|
||
|
||
|
||
e.
|
||
Derive
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
k
|
||
L
|
||
L
|
||
up
|
||
EIRP
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
G
|
||
pol
|
||
path
|
||
o
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
−
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.5
|
||
CHANNEL BANDWIDTH AND AMPLITUDE RIPPLE
|
||
|
||
B.5.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the bandwidth and amplitude ripple in the GEOSAR
|
||
repeater channel. The test must be performed for each channel bandwidth mode of operation.
|
||
The test can be performed in the fixed gain mode on transponders that have selectable ALC
|
||
ON/OFF, however, it is desirable to perform the test for both the fixed gain and ALC mode
|
||
configurations.
|
||
|
||
B.5.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The level of 406 MHz beacon signals received at the spacecraft is sufficiently small such that
|
||
under normal situations a band of white noise generated by the LNA is transmitted on the
|
||
channel. The amplitude ripple of the channel can be estimated by observing this band of noise
|
||
power at the ground test facility. The observation should be done during a "quiet" period, i.e.,
|
||
no interference or large test inputs. Swept frequency techniques may be used as an alternate
|
||
procedure.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.5.2.1
|
||
Channel frequency response (phase modulation repeater)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-6
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Monitor the downlink baseband signal after the ground station phase
|
||
demodulator with the spacecraft in the narrowband mode and ALC
|
||
disabled (fixed gain mode). The analyser centre frequency,
|
||
resolution bandwidth and span should be adjusted to appropriately
|
||
display the channel data.
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Take a spectrum plot during a quiet period.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Use the spectrum analyser offset markers to identify the 3-dB
|
||
bandwidth. Print a record for the test report.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Repeat steps a through c for the following modes as applicable:
|
||
narrowband/ALC ON, wideband/ALC OFF and wideband/ALC
|
||
ON.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.5.2.2
|
||
Channel frequency response (frequency translator repeater)
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
With the spacecraft in the narrowband mode and ALC disabled,
|
||
monitor the downlink signal in the ground station receiver IF ahead
|
||
of any filtering that would corrupt the channel measurement. The
|
||
analyser centre frequency, resolution bandwidth and span should be
|
||
adjusted to appropriately display the channel data.
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Take a spectrum plot during a quiet period.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Use the spectrum analyser offset markers to identify the 3-dB
|
||
bandwidth. Print a record for the test report.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Repeat steps a through c for the modes as applicable:
|
||
narrowband/ALC ON, wideband/ALC OFF and wideband/ALC
|
||
ON.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-7
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.6
|
||
DOWNLINK CARRIER FREQUENCY
|
||
|
||
B.6.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the GEOSAR phase modulation type repeater downlink
|
||
carrier frequency.
|
||
|
||
B.6.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The frequency of the downlink signals received at the ground test facility can be measured with
|
||
a spectrum analyser that has a counter mode with a 1 Hz resolution. The downlink signal for
|
||
the phase modulation type transponder contains sufficient carrier level for isolating and
|
||
measuring the carrier frequency. Alternately the receiver can be turned OFF so that no
|
||
modulation is present on the carrier when making the measurement.
|
||
|
||
The general procedure is as follows.
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Monitor the downlink frequency in the 1st IF with the spectrum analyser. Select
|
||
a resolution bandwidth such that the carrier can be isolated from the modulation
|
||
sidebands and the C/N ratio is 20 dB.
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Measure the carrier frequency using the analyser frequency counter mode.
|
||
Alternate techniques may be used if the analyser does not have the counter
|
||
mode.
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
A minimum of 20 measurements at 1-minute intervals should be taken and
|
||
averaged to determine the carrier frequency. This data should also be examined
|
||
to determine if carrier frequency drift is occurring.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.7
|
||
ALC DYNAMIC RANGE
|
||
|
||
B.7.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to measure the gain transfer function with the GEOSAR transponder
|
||
in the ALC mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.7.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The gain transfer function is a measure of the transponder output power versus transponder
|
||
input power. This procedure uses unmodulated carrier signals only. The uplink signal EIRP is
|
||
varied in level over the dynamic range of the SAR receiver, from input noise to the maximum
|
||
allowable signal into the transponder. The resulting downlink carrier level, Cd, is measured in
|
||
the pre-detection IF bandwidth using a spectrum analyzer. This measurement can also be made
|
||
after phase demodulation for phase modulation type SAR repeaters such as those on the GOES
|
||
spacecraft. Plot the transfer curve using the measured data.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-8
|
||
|
||
|
||
The general procedure is as follows:
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Begin with no uplink. Monitor the downlink to ensure that no active beacons
|
||
or interference signals are present. Record the downlink carrier signal strength.
|
||
Note that the level of the 1544.5 MHz carrier for the phase modulation repeaters
|
||
will remain essentially constant throughout the test.
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Establish a CW uplink signal at a frequency near mid-band and an EIRP of
|
||
5 Watts. Observe this signal on the downlink using the spectrum analyzer.
|
||
Increase the uplink signal level to the point where the observed downlink signal,
|
||
Cd, does not continue to increase, i.e., the AGC is operating at the upper limit
|
||
of the dynamic range. Record the uplink EIRP and the value of the measured
|
||
downlink signal and the SAR receiver No (measured a few kHz away from Cd
|
||
using the spectrum analyzer). The downlink should be free of interference when
|
||
making these measurements.
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Decrement the CW uplink signal in 1 dB steps; monitor the downlink to ensure
|
||
there is no interference present and record the measured values of Cd, No and
|
||
the uplink EIRP. Continue to reduce the uplink signal by 1 dB and make the
|
||
measurements until Cd approaches the receiver noise level.
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Repeat steps a through c for the spacecraft modes as applicable:
|
||
narrowband/ALC ON, wideband/ALC ON.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following equation and data from this test may also be used to derive an estimate of SAR
|
||
repeater gain to noise temperature ratio, G/T(406).
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
k
|
||
L
|
||
L
|
||
up
|
||
EIRP
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
G
|
||
pol
|
||
path
|
||
o
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
+
|
||
−
|
||
=
|
||
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
T
|
||
G
|
||
=SAR 406 MHz repeater gain to noise temperature ratio (dBK-1).
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
o
|
||
= carrier to noise density ratio in the SAR repeater. (dB-Hz).
|
||
N0 = noise power spectral density in a 1 Hz bandwidth.
|
||
EIRP(up) = known up-link EIRP. (dBm).
|
||
Lpath = up-link free space path loss. (dB).
|
||
Lpol
|
||
= polarisation mismatch loss between the up-link antenna and the satellite
|
||
receive antenna. (dB).
|
||
K
|
||
= Boltzmann's constant = -198.6 (dBm/Hz-K).
|
||
|
||
The AGC functions to maintain a constant power at the spacecraft receiver output. Note the
|
||
point on the AGC curve that is 3 dB below the maximum. At this point the test uplink input
|
||
referred to the SAR low noise amplifier input, Cu, and total receiver noise power, N, in the
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-9
|
||
|
||
|
||
channel bandwidth are equal; therefore, Cu /N = 0 dB. Knowing also that N = kTB = No B
|
||
where B is the channel bandwidth, the value of C/No(up) = B for this specific uplink signal.
|
||
|
||
The G/T(406) can be derived by using the above equation with
|
||
(
|
||
)
|
||
up
|
||
N
|
||
C
|
||
o
|
||
= B and EIRP(up) =
|
||
the value of the uplink EIRP used for the point on the AGC curve that is 3 dB below the
|
||
maximum value.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.8
|
||
MODULATION INDEX
|
||
|
||
B.8.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The purpose of this test is to measure the modulation index for phase modulated type GEOSAR
|
||
repeaters. The test should be conducted for each of the available bandwidth/ALC operating
|
||
modes: narrow band/ALC ON, narrow band/ALC OFF, wide band/ALC ON, and wide
|
||
band/ALC OFF.
|
||
|
||
B.8.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The difference in the received downlink carrier level when the SAR receiver is switched from
|
||
OFF to ON (i.e., carrier suppression technique) is measured at the ground test facility. Distress
|
||
beacon signals are very small resulting in the receiver output being mostly noise. This band of
|
||
noise (wide band or narrow band) is phase modulated onto the GEOSAR spacecraft downlink
|
||
carrier. The general procedure is as follows and should be repeated for each bandwidth/ALC
|
||
mode of operation.
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Configure the space segment receiver to OFF. Monitor the downlink carrier
|
||
with a spectrum analyser. Select an analyser resolution such that the received
|
||
C/N 20 dB. Record the level of CRx_off.
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Configure the space segment receiver to ON. Monitor the downlink carrier with
|
||
a spectrum analyser. Select an analyser resolution such that the received C/N
|
||
20 dB. Record the level of CRx_on. The downlink spectrum should be monitored
|
||
during the measurement of CRx_on. to assure that no large interfering signal is
|
||
in the band when making the measurements. This condition would result in
|
||
higher values of modulation index.
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Compute value of carrier suppression as of CRx_off. - CRx_on.
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Repeat steps a through c for each bandwidth/ALC mode.
|
||
|
||
e.
|
||
The test data should include the carrier suppression values with the associated
|
||
modulation index.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-10
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.9
|
||
TRANSLATION FREQUENCIES
|
||
|
||
B.9.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
A 406 MHz signal at the repeater input is translated to a specific frequency in the downlink
|
||
spectrum as a function of the spacecraft local oscillators. The objective of this is to measure
|
||
the frequency in the downlink to which a 406 MHz beacon signal is translated.
|
||
|
||
B.9.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
The frequency of the downlink signals received at the ground test facility can be measured with
|
||
a spectrum analyser that has a counter mode with a 1 Hz resolution. A 406 MHz band cw test
|
||
signal at a precise frequency must be transmitted from the ground test facility to the satellite
|
||
for use in measuring the translation frequency. In order to obtain accurate measurements, the
|
||
cw test uplink signal, the spectrum analyser, and all down conversions in the ground station
|
||
receiver must be locked to a precision frequency standard.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.9.2.1
|
||
Beacon to downlink translation frequency (phase modulation repeater).
|
||
|
||
This test can be performed in either the wideband or narrowband mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
With the spacecraft in the wideband mode, uplink a 406.05 MHz
|
||
(406.025 MHz if in narrowband mode) cw carrier at 10 dBW EIRP.
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Monitor the translated downlink frequency in the baseband
|
||
spectrum after phase demodulation. Select a spectrum analyser
|
||
resolution bandwidth such that the received signal has a C/N ratio
|
||
20 dB.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Measure the carrier frequency using the analyser frequency counter
|
||
mode. Alternate techniques may be used if the analyser does not
|
||
have the counter mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
A minimum of 20 measurements at 30-second intervals should be
|
||
taken and averaged to determine the carrier frequency. This data
|
||
should also be examined to determine if the translation oscillators
|
||
are drifting in frequency.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.9.2.2.
|
||
Beacon to downlink translation frequency (frequency translation repeater).
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
With the spacecraft in the wideband mode, uplink a 406.05 MHz
|
||
(406.025 MHz if in narrowband mode) cw carrier at 10 dBW EIRP.
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Monitor the translated downlink frequency in the 1st IF with the
|
||
spectrum analyser. Select a resolution bandwidth such that the
|
||
received signal has a C/N ratio 20 dB.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-11
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Measure the carrier frequency using the analyser frequency counter
|
||
mode. Alternate techniques may be used if the analyser does not
|
||
have the counter mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
A minimum of 20 measurements at 30-second intervals should be
|
||
taken and averaged to determine the carrier frequency. This data
|
||
should also be examined to determine if the translation oscillators
|
||
are drifting in frequency.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.10
|
||
INTERMODULATION LEVELS
|
||
|
||
B.10.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The objective of this test is to determine the levels of any intermodulation products in the SAR
|
||
channel. The SAR transponder operates with inputs from multiple users at different
|
||
frequencies in the band. There are also uplinks from unauthorized users which are called
|
||
interferers. If the levels of intermodulation products in the transponder band are too high, they
|
||
can interfere with beacon signals that are at or near the same frequencies as the intermodulation
|
||
products.
|
||
|
||
The test should be conducted in all modes as applicable to the specific type of GEOSAR
|
||
repeater.
|
||
|
||
B.10.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
Two equal large level carriers at 1 kHz separation shall be applied at the transponder input. The
|
||
downlink spectrum is examined with a spectrum analyzer in the pre-detection IF bandwidth for
|
||
third order intermodulation products. This measurement can also be made after phase
|
||
demodulation for phase modulation type SAR repeaters such as those on the GOES spacecraft.
|
||
A record of the measured spectrum should be recorded to support analysis and for inclusion in
|
||
the test report. The level of intermodulation products in dB below the test signal output shall
|
||
be measured.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.10.2.1 Procedure for SAR repeaters on GOES spacecraft.
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Determine the test signal input power levels for the repeater mode
|
||
being tested. Each test signal, Sin, must be 7 dB above total receiver
|
||
noise level for modes with ALC ON. When in fixed gain mode
|
||
(FGM), Sin, is set to 2 dB above total receiver noise level.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The receiver noise is equal to kTBn where Bn is the noise bandwidth
|
||
of the receiver for the specific operating mode. Bn can be estimated
|
||
by using the 3 dB filter bandwidth measured during test B.5.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The input Sin/No of the test signal can be determined as follows.
|
||
|
||
ALC modes Sin/No = Bn + 7 dB-Hz
|
||
|
||
|
||
FGM
|
||
Sin/No = Bn + 2 dB-Hz
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-12
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Select a spacecraft configuration to be tested and monitor the
|
||
received baseband using the spectrum analyzer. Uplink two test
|
||
signals with the frequencies and power necessary to achieve the
|
||
Sin/No values listed in the following table.
|
||
|
||
Configuration
|
||
F1 (MHz)
|
||
F2 (MHz)
|
||
Bn (dB-Hz)
|
||
Sin/No
|
||
(dB-Hz)
|
||
Specification
|
||
Relative to Sin
|
||
WB- ALC
|
||
406.0495
|
||
406.0505
|
||
Bwb per test B.5
|
||
Bwb + 7
|
||
-30 dB
|
||
WB–Fixed Gain
|
||
406.0495
|
||
406.0505
|
||
Bwb per test B.5
|
||
Bwb + 2
|
||
-20 dB
|
||
NB – ALC
|
||
406.0245
|
||
406.0255
|
||
Bnb per test B.5
|
||
Bnb + 7
|
||
-30 dB
|
||
NB- Fixed gain
|
||
406.0245
|
||
406.0255
|
||
Bnb per test B.5
|
||
Bnb + 2
|
||
-20 dB
|
||
Bwb is the receiver noise bandwidth measured per test B.5 when in the wide band mode.
|
||
Bnb is the receiver noise bandwidth measured per test B.5 when in the narrow band mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Record the spectrum. For wideband examine the spectrum from 48
|
||
to 53 kHz for spurious signals. For narrowband, examine the
|
||
spectrum from 23 kHz to 28 kHz for spurious signals. Any spurious
|
||
signals observed must be below the input signal in accordance with
|
||
column 6 of the above table.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
Change modes and repeat step a and b until all modes have been
|
||
tested.
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.11
|
||
BEACON SIGNAL PROCESSING
|
||
|
||
B.11.1 OBJECTIVE
|
||
|
||
The purpose of this test is to demonstrate that 406 MHz beacon signals relayed through the
|
||
GEOSAR repeater are properly processed by a GEOLUT with sufficient reliability for
|
||
distribution within the Cospas-Sarsat network.
|
||
|
||
B.11.2 PROCEDURE
|
||
|
||
Beacon output signals at specific levels will be transmitted to the GEOSAR and relayed to a
|
||
GEOLUT for reception and processing. The test, therefore, requires use of beacon signal
|
||
processing as done by a GEOLUT. Any GEOSAR spacecraft operator that does not have this
|
||
capability can request assistance from a GEOLUT operator located in the coverage area.
|
||
|
||
This test is based on a modification of test T-1, Processing Threshold and System Margin, as
|
||
described in document C/S R.006. A controlled test beacon simulator is necessary for the test.
|
||
It is required that the EIRP of this beacon simulator be adjustable, that multiple identification
|
||
codes be transmitted, and that the burst transmissions are controllable in message blocks as
|
||
described in C/S R.006. The general procedure is as follows.
|
||
|
||
|
||
a.
|
||
Place the beacon simulator in the satellite FOV with an elevation angle to the
|
||
satellite > 5 degrees.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B-13
|
||
|
||
|
||
b.
|
||
Configure the satellite for the wideband/fixed gain mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
c.
|
||
Configure the beacon simulator as follows:
|
||
|
||
|
||
(i)
|
||
Set the EIRP to +37 dBm.
|
||
|
||
|
||
(ii)
|
||
Use 3 to 4 identification codes to allow immediate restarting of the test
|
||
after a GEOLUT measurement.
|
||
|
||
|
||
(iii)
|
||
Transmit 100 message blocks.
|
||
|
||
|
||
d.
|
||
GEOLUT operator measure the number of valid messages received and the
|
||
C/No of the beacon message for the +37 dBm signal.
|
||
|
||
|
||
e.
|
||
Calculate the probability of detecting a valid message (PDVM) as the number
|
||
of valid messages processed divided by total number of message blocks
|
||
transmitted. The PDVM should be >0.99.
|
||
|
||
|
||
f.
|
||
Reset the beacon simulator as follows:
|
||
|
||
|
||
(i)
|
||
Reduce the EIRP from +37 dBm by (C/No - 26) dB where C/No is the
|
||
value measured in step d. This will provide a received beacon signal
|
||
with a C/No 26 dB-Hz.
|
||
|
||
|
||
(ii)
|
||
Use the same 3 to 4 identification codes as in step 3 to allow immediate
|
||
restarting of the test after a GEOLUT measurement.
|
||
|
||
|
||
(iii)
|
||
Transmit 100 message blocks.
|
||
|
||
g.
|
||
Calculate the PDVM as the number of valid messages processed divided by total
|
||
number of message blocks transmitted. The PDVM should be >0.95.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
-END OF ANNEX B-
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEX C
|
||
|
||
|
||
GEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT ASSESSMENT
|
||
INDICATORS / COMPLIANCE LEVELS
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table C.1:
|
||
GOES Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels
|
||
|
||
Assessment Indicator
|
||
Compliance Level Reference
|
||
L-band EIRP
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.3
|
||
Spectral occupancy (of downlink)
|
||
C/S T.011, Figure 3.2
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz receiver
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.2
|
||
Modulation index
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.3
|
||
Downlink carrier frequency (long term)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.3
|
||
Translation frequency
|
||
|
||
Wideband mode (relative to 406.05 MHz in)
|
||
|
||
Location in baseband
|
||
|
||
Narrowband mode (relative to 406.025 MHz in)
|
||
|
||
Location in baseband
|
||
C/S T.011, Section 3.3
|
||
Narrowband channel bandwidth (relative to
|
||
406.025 MHz centre frequency)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 dB Bandwidth
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3 dB Bandwidth
|
||
20 dB Bandwidth
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.2
|
||
Wideband channel bandwidth (relative to
|
||
406.05 MHz centre frequency)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 dB Bandwidth
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3 dB Bandwidth
|
||
20 dB Bandwidth
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.2
|
||
ALC dynamic range
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.2
|
||
Intermodulation Levels
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 3.3
|
||
Beacon signal Probability of Detecting Valid
|
||
Messages
|
||
C/S T.009, Section 5.1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C-2
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table C.2:
|
||
INSAT Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels
|
||
|
||
Assessment Indicator
|
||
Compliance Level Reference
|
||
EIRP in SAR channel
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Spectral occupancy (of downlink)
|
||
C/S T.011, Figures 4.2a and 4.2b
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz receiver
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Modulation index
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Downlink carrier frequency Stability
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Translation frequency stability
|
||
|
||
Wideband mode (relative to 406.05 MHz in)
|
||
|
||
Location in baseband
|
||
|
||
Narrowband mode (relative to 406.025 MHz in)
|
||
|
||
Location in baseband
|
||
C/S T.011, section 4.3
|
||
|
||
Narrowband channel 1 dB bandwidth (relative to
|
||
406.025 MHz)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Wideband channel 1 dB bandwidth (relative to
|
||
406.05 MHz)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
ALC dynamic range
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 4.2
|
||
Beacon signal Probability of Detecting Valid
|
||
Messages
|
||
C/S T.009, Section 5.1
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table C.3:
|
||
Electro-L Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels
|
||
|
||
Assessment Indicator
|
||
Compliance Level Reference
|
||
EIRP in SAR channel
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 5.3
|
||
Spectral occupancy (of downlink)
|
||
C/S T.011, Figures 5.1a and 5.1b.
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz receiver
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 5.2
|
||
Downlink frequency with 406 MHz signal input
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 5.3
|
||
Translation frequency stability: long term
|
||
|
||
One day
|
||
|
||
1.0 second
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 5.3
|
||
Channel bandwidth (3 dB relative to 406.05 MHz)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 5.2
|
||
Beacon signal Probability of Detecting Valid
|
||
Messages
|
||
C/S T.009, Section 5.1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
C-3
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table C.4:
|
||
MSG Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels
|
||
|
||
Assessment Indicator
|
||
Compliance Level Reference
|
||
EIRP in SAR channel
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 6.2
|
||
Spectral occupancy (of downlink)
|
||
C/S T.011, Figure 6.2a
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz receiver
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 6.2
|
||
Downlink carrier frequency (with 406.05 MHz in)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 6.2
|
||
Translation frequency accuracy:
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 6.2
|
||
Channel bandwidth: 0.5 dB relative to 406.05 MHz
|
||
Noise Equivalent bandwidth
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 6.2
|
||
Beacon signal Probability of Detecting Valid
|
||
Messages
|
||
C/S T.009, Section 5.1
|
||
|
||
|
||
Table C.5:
|
||
MTG Space Segment Assessment Indicators / Compliance Levels
|
||
|
||
Assessment Indicator
|
||
Compliance Level Reference
|
||
EIRP in SAR channel
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 8.1
|
||
Spectral occupancy (of downlink)
|
||
C/S T.011, Figures 8.2 & 8.3
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz receiver
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 8.1
|
||
Downlink carrier frequency (with 406.05 MHz in)
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 8.1
|
||
Translation frequency accuracy:
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 8.1
|
||
Channel bandwidth: 0.5 dB relative to 406.05 MHz
|
||
Noise Equivalent bandwidth
|
||
C/S T.011, Table 8.1
|
||
Beacon signal Probability of Detecting Valid
|
||
Messages
|
||
C/S T.009, Section 5.1
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF ANNEX C -
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
D-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEX D
|
||
|
||
|
||
GEOSAR IOC STATUS MESSAGE
|
||
|
||
|
||
Should the test results confirm that the payload satisfies IOC requirements, the commissioning
|
||
authority shall distribute the information identified in sections 1 and 2 below throughout the
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat system using a SIT 605 message. Items not tested must be so noted as comments
|
||
in the SIT 605 message.
|
||
|
||
1.0
|
||
Test Results
|
||
|
||
SPACECRAFT - _________
|
||
|
||
|
||
Date
|
||
Test
|
||
Result
|
||
Pass / Fail
|
||
Comments
|
||
B.1
|
||
EIRP in SAR Channel
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.2
|
||
Spectral Occupancy of the Downlink
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.3
|
||
Spurious Output Levels
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.4
|
||
G/T of 406 MHz Repeater
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.5
|
||
Channel Bandwidth and Amplitude Ripple
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.6
|
||
Downlink Carrier Frequency
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.7
|
||
ALC Dynamic Range
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.8
|
||
Modulation Index
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.9
|
||
Translation Frequencies
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.10 Intermodulation and Harmonic Levels
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
B.11 Beacon Signal Processing
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Note:
|
||
Graphics and supplementary data may be provided as attachments to this report and provided to the
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat for permanent retention.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
T13OCT25.01
|
||
D-2
|
||
|
||
|
||
2.0
|
||
IOC Mode
|
||
|
||
The spacecraft will be operated in the following IOC mode.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Channel Bandwidth
|
||
WB or NB
|
||
|
||
ALC
|
||
|
||
|
||
ON or Off
|
||
|
||
Operational Limitations:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Commissioning Authority:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Date:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF ANNEX D -
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
E-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
ANNEX E
|
||
|
||
|
||
GEOSAR COMMISSIONING REPORT
|
||
|
||
Should the test results confirm that the GEOSAR payload satisfies commissioning
|
||
requirements, the commissioning authority shall distribute the information contained in the
|
||
commissioning report as identified below throughout the Cospas-Sarsat system using a SIT
|
||
605 message.
|
||
|
||
Satellite: ___________
|
||
|
||
Date __________
|
||
|
||
Configuration
|
||
|
||
Pass/Fail*
|
||
Operational,
|
||
Limited Operation,
|
||
Not Operational
|
||
|
||
Comments
|
||
NB/Fixed gain
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NB/ALC On
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
WB/Fixed gain
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
WB/ALC On
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Payload Status: FOC or LOC
|
||
|
||
Initial operational configuration:
|
||
|
||
The spacecraft will initially be operated in the following mode:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Channel Bandwidth
|
||
WB or NB
|
||
|
||
ALC
|
||
|
||
|
||
ON or Off
|
||
|
||
Operational Limitations:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Other Remarks:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Commissioning Authority:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Date:
|
||
|
||
|
||
-END OF ANNEX E-
|
||
|
||
- END OF DOCUMENT -
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat
|
||
1250 René-Lévesque Blvd. West, Suite 4215, Montreal (Quebec) H3B 4W8 Canada
|
||
Telephone: +1 514 500 7999
|
||
Fax: +1 514 500 7996
|
||
Email: mail@cospas-sarsat.int
|
||
Website: http://www.cospas-sarsat.int |