Ryan Malloy 4ed92efd69 refactor: move spec references out of published site
Cospas-Sarsat specification summaries moved to reference/ for internal
use only. Links updated to point to official cospas-sarsat.int site.

The extracted images remain in public/ for use in other pages.
2026-02-13 05:03:09 -07:00

481 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
title: "G009: Action Plan In The Event Of Possible Leosar Degradation Prior To"
description: "Official Cospas-Sarsat G-series document G009"
sidebar:
badge:
text: "G"
variant: "note"
# Extended Cospas-Sarsat metadata
documentId: "G009"
series: "G"
seriesName: "General"
documentType: "overview"
isLatest: true
documentDate: "December 2015"
---
> **📋 Document Information**
>
> **Series:** G-Series (General)
> **Date:** December 2015
> **Source:** [Cospas-Sarsat Official Documents](https://www.cospas-sarsat.int/en/documents-pro/system-documents)
---
**ACTION PLAN IN THE EVENT OF POSSIBLE LEOSAR DEGRADATION PRIOR TO**
**MEOSAR FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY**
**C/S G.009**
**Issue 1**
**December 2015**
**ACTION PLAN IN THE EVENT OF POSSIBLE LEOSAR DEGRADATION PRIOR TO**
**MEOSAR FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY**
**HISTORY**
Issue Revision Date Comments
1 - December 2015 Approved by Council (CSC-55)
**Table of Contents**
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Background .................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Scope .............................................................................................................................. 1-2
2. OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF A DEGRADED LEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT ............... 2-1
3. REVIEW OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS TO MITIGATE LEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT
DEGRADATION ................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 Actions Taken to Use Available MEOSAR Capability to Augment the LEOSAR
System............................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.2 Actions Taken to Accelerate the Transition from the LEOSAR System to the
MEOSAR System .......................................................................................................... 3-2
4. MEOSAR IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS TO MITIGATE LEOSAR SPACE
SEGMENT DEGRADATION ............................................................................................. 4-1
4.1 General Considerations .................................................................................................. 4-1
4.2 Implementation of the Action Plan ................................................................................ 4-1
4.3 Guidelines for Work for Designated Panel of Experts .................................................. 4-2
4. ~~4~~ Actions to be taken if LEOSAR Space Segment Degradation Occurs Prior to IOC ..... 4-2
4.5 Actions to be taken if LEOSAR Space Segment Degradation Occurs During IOC ..... 4-3
5. SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 5-1
1 - 1 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**1.** **INTRODUCTION**
**1.1** **Purpose and Objectives**
The purpose of this plan is to:
- provide information and guidance to LEOSAR and MEOSAR ground segment providers for
the period covering the transition from the LEOSAR system to the MEOSAR system; and
- consider possible courses of action the Cospas-Sarsat Council may take in the event the
LEOSAR space segment is degraded to the point where latency of alerts unduly increases the
delay in SAR authorities receiving distress alerts.
The objectives of this plan are to:
- reduce the consequences of any LEOSAR space segment operational discontinuity prior to
the MEOSAR system being declared at Full Operational Capability (FOC); and
- take advantage of MEOSAR ground segment deployment so that users will be able to benefit
as soon as possible from early capabilities of the MEOSAR system.
The document directly addresses strategic goal #1 of the Cospas-Sarsat Strategic Plan, which aims to
provide continuity of space and ground operations within a twenty-year timeframe.
**1.2** **Background**
The Cospas-Sarsat Programme was established under the International Cospas-Sarsat Agreement
(ICSPA) signed by Canada, France, the USSR, and the United States (the “Parties”) in Paris on
1 July 1988. The Parties are to contribute to the Programme on a long term basis so as to maintain the
Space Segment of the System. The Agreement provides the basis for the continuity of the CospasSarsat Space Segment and its availability to all States on a non-discriminatory basis, and free of
charge for the end-user in distress. The Agreement stipulates contributions of the Parties to the Space
Segment, under normal conditions, that result in the availability of four operating payloads delivering
relevant Cospas-Sarsat alert and location data to search and rescue authorities (Article 5 of the
Agreement.). Effectively, this is the minimum operational configuration considered acceptable to the
Parties. However, the ICSPA does not address how many unique orbits the four satellites should
maintain or the minimal acceptable performance. It is clear that the performance achieved by four
satellites in a single orbit would be a significant reduction in capability compared to four satellites in
two or more orbits and, therefore, the number of unique orbits maintained by the satellites is a
contributing factor in the determination of degraded capability.
As of May 2015 there were five LEOSAR payloads in orbit and plans to replenish the constellation
were proceeding. The United States SIDAR Program is planning to launch a LEOSAR satellite at the
end of 2019. The Russian Federation is also working on plans to sustain the LEOSAR constellation
1 - 2 C/S G.009 Issue 1
by launching two satellites potentially in 2016 and 2017. Even with these plans there is still a risk of
a gap in the constellation if a launch is not successful or some operational satellites fail.
This document establishes a minimal level of performance for the LEOSAR space segment for the
purpose of determining when mitigation actions are necessary to offset any degradation of LEOSAR
system performance prior to the declaration of MEOSAR system FOC.
A smooth transition from LEOSAR plus GEOSAR (LEO/GEO) system operations to MEOSAR plus
GEOSAR (MEO/GEO) operations requires that adequate LEOSAR infrastructure and LEOSAR
operation be maintained until the MEOSAR infrastructure is ready and the MEOSAR system is
declared at FOC. Space segment management issues are particularly challenging because the
hardware used has long procurement cycles, operating lifetime variability, and high development,
manufacturing and operation cost. For the Cospas-Sarsat Programme, this difficulty is often
compounded by the fact that Cospas-Sarsat payloads are secondary payloads onboard satellites with a
larger primary payload, which add schedule and orbit constraints.
**1.3** **Scope**
This Plan will be in effect from the time of its approval until the MEOSAR system (space and ground
segment) is declared at full operational capability. This period will include the MEOSAR
demonstration and evaluation (D&E), MEOSAR Early Operational Capability (EOC), and MEOSAR
Initial Operational Capability (IOC). During this time a constantly changing system configuration is
expected as Participants introduce MEOSAR ready ground segment equipment and additional
MEOSAR satellites.
Therefore, the details of the actions that may be required to respond to any particular situation of
LEOSAR space segment degradation will depend, among other things, on the status of the
Programme at the time this action plan must be put into effect.
The Plan outlines the actions that Participants can undertake to minimise the impact of LEOSAR
degradation prior to MEOSAR system FOC, and the guidelines which the Council can use to provide
direction in the event of any determined degradation beyond the minimal acceptable performance.
The Plan does not address any programmatic issues, but focuses on the pragmatic actions that can be
taken by all Programme Participants.
- END OF SECTION 1
2 - 1 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**2.** **OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF A DEGRADED LEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT**
The most significant consequence of a degraded LEOSAR space segment is the increased average
time required to detect and locate an activated distress beacon. As the number of LEOSAR payloads
in orbit or the number of unique orbits decreases, the time interval between satellite passes over any
particular geographic location increases [1] . The maximum waiting time required to establish the
position of an active beacon is determined by the interval between satellite passes as seen by the
beacon. The average time between satellite passes varies as a function of satellite configurations
(number of satellites and orbital planes) and beacon latitude. Given the different orbital parameters of
the various LEOSAR satellites and the drift of orbits over time, the time interval between satellite
passes that might be experienced by a hypothetical beacon at a given location cannot be uniquely
solved (because the geometry is not sufficiently stable and repetitive). Therefore, this can only be
analysed in a statistical manner.
This kind of analysis shows that in general, a reduced number of LEOSAR payloads have a more
noticeable impact at low and medium latitudes, where median satellite gap times increase by up to
six times when comparing baseline (ICSPA nominal deployment) and worst case satellite
configurations. The analysis shows that satellite gap times are not only influenced by the number of
satellites in orbit but also by the number of orbital planes used by these satellites.
The LEOSAR space segment should be considered as starting to degrade beyond the minimal
acceptable performance when any LEOSAR space segment time delay between two satellite passes
at the equator exceeds 4 hours 95% of the time. When this condition is met, an assessment of actions
should be invoked as outlined in section 4 of this document.
It is noted that the immediate detection capability permitted by the GEOSAR system allows SAR
responders to initiate the search and rescue process that will mitigate latency degradation. In
addition, data from registration databases will provide useful information to operational search
and rescue services.
- END OF SECTION 2
1 G aps between satellite passes constitute the maximum delays that a user would experience. Users can activate their beacons anytime between
satellite passes. While a “fortunate” beacon user might activate his beacon shortly before a satellite pass, the “unfortunate” one might activate his
beacon shortly after a satellite pass and would have to wait for the next satellite pass to get the distress signals forwarded through the LEOSAR
system. Considering that activations are spread over the total duration of satellite gaps, average latency experienced by the system would be
approximately half of the values calculated for the satellite gaps.
3 - 1 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**3.** **REVIEW OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS TO MITIGATE LEOSAR SPACE SEGMENT**
**DEGRADATION**
Actions which could be undertaken by the Cospas-Sarsat Participants if the LEOSAR space segment
performance drops to an unacceptable level prior to the MEOSAR declaration of FOC can be
summarized as:
- those actions taken to use available MEOSAR capability to augment the LEOSAR system,
- those actions taken to accelerate the transition to MEOSAR EOC _,_ IOC and FOC.
**3.1** **Actions Taken to Use Available MEOSAR Capability to Augment the LEOSAR System**
These actions include the use of the available capability of the MEOSAR system to provide
detections and independent locations thereby providing additional alert data to the existing
LEO/GEO data distribution channel.
This approach is dependent on the availability of both the MEOSAR space and ground segments.
Adequate evaluation of MEOSAR performance will likely be achievable only once a certain amount
of MEOSAR D&E testing has been completed. Both of these conditions will likely be met at
MEOSAR system EOC, and will be met at MEOSAR IOC at the latest. To begin any operational
phase, it must be determined that the data provided by the MEOSAR system does not degrade the
performance of the Cospas-Sarsat System.
The minimum level of performance of the MEOSAR system, more specifically the MEOLUTs,
needs to be defined for each phase of the MEOSAR development. This would also require the
development of suitable parallel processes for data distribution from non-operational (or noncommissioned) MEOLUTs to RCCs. While this mitigation action could provide tangible benefits and
reduce the impact of a shortage of LEOSAR payloads, its benefits would be limited to areas
adequately covered by a sufficient number of MEOLUT antennas. The information provided by
MEOLUTs may also not be available in a reliable manner as MEOLUTs used prior to MEOSAR
system IOC may not be providing 24/7 services.
Actions taken to use available MEOSAR capability to augment the LEOSAR system as it degrades
are inherently limited by the state of the MEOSAR assets, processes and procedures at the time when
it becomes necessary. While these actions would be necessary components of any action plan, it is
equally important to consider how progress towards global MEOSAR coverage might be accelerated
to maximize the MEOSAR systems capability to augment the LEOSAR system and eventually to
replace it.
3 - 2 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**3.2** **Actions Taken to Accelerate the Transition from the LEOSAR System to the**
**MEOSAR System**
This category of actions includes possible actions aimed at reducing the time for the Cospas-Sarsat
Programme to transition from an operational LEOSAR system to an operational MEOSAR system
that can provide partial and eventually full global coverage.
These actions also provide a more comprehensive solution to the issue of the potential degradation of
the LEOSAR space segment. As such, they require important changes to the current MEOSAR
implementation schedule and significant efforts from the Programme in the short term.
The proposed mitigation actions consist of the Cospas-Sarsat Programme accelerating development
and implementation of the MEOSAR capabilities and distribution system to maximize the capability
of the MEOSAR system by:
- using the S-band DASS MEOSAR payloads in a combined S- and L-band MEOSAR system
until the MEOSAR L-band system alone will be declared at FOC,
- increasing MEOLUT networking capability to provide enhanced MEOSAR coverage beyond
what would be available from a ground segment consisting only of stand-alone MEOLUTs,
- assessing MEOLUT MEO/GEO capability to augment the number of channels available to
provide data for the difference of arrival processing that is used in the MEOSAR system to
generate independent location solutions,
- accelerating the expansion of the MEOLUT coverage area and global MEOSAR coverage
definition,
- establishing procedures, specifications and standards, as well as the interim procedures to be
able to execute this action plan smoothly.
It should be noted advancing MEOSAR FOC would require the accelerated deployment of a worldwide network of MEOLUTs and LEO/GEO/MEO MCCs, and the completion of the MEOSAR D&E
(including implementation of the EOC) and the IOC phases. This would require additional
commitments and effort from Administrations involved in activities during these phases.
- END OF SECTION 3
4 - 1 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**4.** **MEOSAR IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS TO MITIGATE LEOSAR SPACE**
**SEGMENT DEGRADATION**
**4.1** **General Considerations**
As soon as possible the Cospas-Sarsat Ground Segment Providers should prepare for the potential
degradation of the 406 MHz LEOSAR space segment. Because it is not possible to predict, or infer,
an exact date when the space segment degradation might occur, it is necessary to consider that it
could happen at any time prior to FOC being achieved. All ground segment providers should develop
plans to implement a rapid transition to the use of MEOSAR data operationally.
It is unrealistic to expect that ground segment providers who have not already begun the process of
acquiring and implementing MEOSAR ground segment equipment can put MEOSAR equipment into
place quickly because of the realities of funding, contracting, and implementation. However, if there
is a rapid degradation of the LEOSAR space segment, operators of MCCs that are not MEOSARready need to have a process in place, consistent with the A-series operational documents describing
the procedures, specifications and standards applicable to each MEOSAR implementation phase, that
will enable their MCCs to receive MEOSAR distress alert messages and distribute them to the
appropriate RCC/SPOC.
Although this Plan assumes that Participants planning to install MEOLUTs and LEO/GEO/MEO
MCCs are taking steps before MEOSAR FOC to ensure a viable MEOSAR ground segment, as
stated in section 1.2, it is critical that the LEOSAR infrastructure and LEOSAR operation be
maintained until the MEOSAR system is declared at FOC. To this end the Cospas-Sarsat Council
engages Participants providing LEOSAR ground segment equipment to request support from
their suppliers with the necessary software upgrades that will allow the actions identified in this
plan to be quickly implemented.
Full operational capability of the MEOSAR system will not be declared until the Council has
assurance that global coverage is provided by the MEOSAR space and ground segments. Therefore,
the LEOSAR space segment, even if degraded, will continue to play a very important role during
MEOSAR EOC and IOC by providing global coverage using the SARP memory. Considering this,
each ground segment provider should evaluate its position to sustain their LEOLUT equipment as
long as possible.
**4.2** **Implementation of the Action Plan**
If a degradation of LEOSAR space segment performance is suspected, a panel of experts established
by the Parties will be requested by the Council to investigate the status of the LEOSAR space
segment and provide findings of their assessment results to the Council. They will provide
recommendations to the Council on specific actions to be taken.
4 - 2 C/S G.009 Issue 1
The expert panel will provide the Council with an analysis of System performance at the time of the
degradation. Coverage areas and expected latency timing should be identified and communicated to
the Council in a report. The analysis results will be considered at Council Session in conjunction with
information on the status of the MEOSAR system implementation, including current status of
MEOSAR ground and space segments, as well as other relevant information. The Council will then
provide the updated performance level of the existing LEOSAR/GEOSAR/MEOSAR systems to
Cospas-Sarsat Participants and Programme stakeholders (IMO/ICAO).
Nodal MCCs will be notified by the Secretariat, acting on behalf of the Council, to provide system
status messages to all MCCs advising them of the recommended Council actions. Each nodal MCC
will then coordinate the data distribution procedures to implement in its data distribution region
based on prior coordination.
**4.3** **Guidelines for Work for Designated Panel of Experts**
The panel of experts identified by the Council to assess the status of the LEOSAR space segment and
the MEOSAR space and ground segments should be composed of individuals with the operational
and technical expertise to perform the tasks required to advise the Council on the appropriate actions
to take in the event of a degradation of the LEOSAR space segment performance prior to MEOSAR
IOC. When activated by the Council the panel should:
- confirm that the LEOSAR space segment has degraded below the performance level
identified in section 2,
- assess the status of the MEOSAR space and ground segment implementation and the
performance of the MEOSAR system,
- provide a brief summary report to Council that provides the findings of the panel and
recommendations for actions that the Council should consider.
**4.** ~~**4**~~ **Actions to be taken if LEOSAR Space Segment Degradation Occurs Prior to IOC**
If an unacceptable degradation of the LEOSAR space segment occurs prior to IOC of the MEOSAR
system, all formal MEOSAR technical and operational standards, system components (space and
ground segments) and data distribution protocols may not be ready for MEOSAR implementation.
The Council will determine, based on the MEOSAR D&E results to date, that the data provided by
the MEOSAR system will not degrade the performance of the Cospas-Sarsat System and should be
distributed in the ground network.
If an unacceptable degradation of the LEOSAR space segment occurs before EOC has been declared,
not all MCCs will have the capability to automatically process inbound MEOSAR alert messages nor
have established procedures to process MEOSAR alert data. These MCCs should be capable of
handling these messages and forwarding them to the appropriate RCC/SPOC for action.
If an unacceptable degradation of the LEOSAR space segment occurs after EOC has been declared,
the panel of experts will analyse if the path to IOC implementation can be re-sequenced or
4 - 3 C/S G.009 Issue 1
accelerated in order to maximize the universal and uniform distribution of MEOSAR data across the
operational COSPAS-SARSAT System.
**4.5** **Actions to be taken if LEOSAR Space Segment Degradation Occurs During IOC**
If unacceptable degradation of the LEOSAR space segment occurs during MEOSAR IOC, each
nodal MCC should be capable of receiving, processing and transmitting MEOSAR alert data to all
MCCs within its data distribution region. Each nodal MCC should coordinate with all MCCs within
its data distribution region on the method of data distribution. For example, nodal MCCs could
format and transmit MEOSAR distress alert messages as SIT 185 (SPOC/RCC format) to nonMEOSAR ready MCCs in its region. Therefore, the method of distribution between MCCs may not
be the same for all data distribution regions and between MCCs and RCCs/SPOCs in each MCC
service area.
- END OF SECTION 4
5 - 1 C/S G.009 Issue 1
**5.** **SUMMARY**
Along with measures that are being considered for maintaining and strengthening the LEOSAR space
segment, this plan recognizes the need to address potential degradation of LEOSAR performance
below the minimal acceptable level and identifies actions that have to be taken by the Cospas-Sarsat
Council and Participants as required in case of such occurrence.
The plan concentrates on early operational use of MEOSAR capabilities available to mitigate
potential LEOSAR degradation if it occurs before MEOSAR FOC. In this regard, it is noted that
efforts under way in preparations for and completion of MEOSAR EOC and IOC would effectively
contribute to this objective.
The plan also recognizes that the required mitigation actions cannot be fully detailed in advance as
they would depend upon an actual cause of degradation and the progress in MEOSAR
implementation at the time of degradation occurrence. To this end, the Expert Panel, established by
the Parties, will be activated by the Council to assess the extent of LEOSAR performance
degradation if and when such degradation is suspected. This panel will then provide the Council with
recommendations on specific actions to be taken.
The plan envisages subsequent actions by the Council and Participants as stipulated in Section 4. In
particular, ground segment providers are encouraged to maintain their LEOSAR equipment in
parallel with implementing their MEOSAR system contributions.
- END OF SECTION 5
- END OF DOCUMENT
Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat
1250 Boul. René-Lévesque West, Suite 4215, Montréal (Québec) H3B 4W8 Canada
Telephone: +1 514 500 7999 / Fax: +1 514 500 7996
Email: mail@cospas-sarsat.int
Website: www.cospas-sarsat.int