Cospas-Sarsat specification summaries moved to reference/ for internal use only. Links updated to point to official cospas-sarsat.int site. The extracted images remain in public/ for use in other pages.
1021 lines
41 KiB
Markdown
1021 lines
41 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "P016: Cospas-Sarsat"
|
||
description: "Official Cospas-Sarsat P-series document P016"
|
||
sidebar:
|
||
badge:
|
||
text: "P"
|
||
variant: "note"
|
||
# Extended Cospas-Sarsat metadata
|
||
documentId: "P016"
|
||
series: "P"
|
||
seriesName: "Programme"
|
||
documentType: "programme"
|
||
isLatest: true
|
||
issue: 1
|
||
revision: 6
|
||
documentDate: "December 2016"
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
> **📋 Document Information**
|
||
>
|
||
> **Series:** P-Series (Programme)
|
||
> **Version:** Issue 1 - Revision 6
|
||
> **Date:** December 2016
|
||
> **Source:** [Cospas-Sarsat Official Documents](https://www.cospas-sarsat.int/en/documents-pro/system-documents)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# **COSPAS-SARSAT** **STRATEGIC PLAN**
|
||
|
||
C/S P.016
|
||
Issue 1 - Revision 6
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 - i - C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**COSPAS-SARSAT STRATEGIC PLAN**
|
||
|
||
**History**
|
||
|
||
**Issue** **Revision** **Date** **Comments**
|
||
|
||
1 - October 2008 Approved by CSC-41.
|
||
|
||
1 1 October 2011 Approved by CSC-47.
|
||
|
||
1 2 October 2012 Approved by CSC-49.
|
||
|
||
1 3 October 2013 Approved by CSC-51.
|
||
|
||
1 4 October 2014 Approved by CSC-53.
|
||
|
||
1 5 December 2015 Approved by CSC-55.
|
||
|
||
1 6 December 2016 Approved by CSC-57.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 - ii - C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
|
||
|
||
**Page**
|
||
|
||
|
||
History ............................................................................................................. i
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... ii
|
||
|
||
|
||
**1.** **Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**2.** **Scope of the Strategic Plan and Programme Background ................................... 2-1**
|
||
|
||
2.1 Scope of the Strategic Plan .................................................................................. 2-1
|
||
|
||
2.2 Cospas-Sarsat Programme Background ............................................................... 2-2
|
||
|
||
2.3 Trend Analysis of User Demand .......................................................................... 2-2
|
||
|
||
|
||
**3.** **Strategic Goals for the Cospas-Sarsat Programme .................................................. 3-1**
|
||
|
||
3.1 Strategic Goal 1 .................................................................................................... 3-2
|
||
|
||
3.2 Strategic Goal 2 .................................................................................................... 3-4
|
||
|
||
3.3 Strategic Goal 3 .................................................................................................... 3-5
|
||
|
||
3.4 Strategic Goal 4 .................................................................................................... 3-6
|
||
|
||
3.5 Strategic Goal 5 .................................................................................................... 3-7
|
||
|
||
|
||
**LIST OF FIGURES**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Figure 1** The Existing LEOSAR and GEOSAR Systems ........................................ B-1
|
||
|
||
**Figure 2** GEO and LEO Orbits ................................................................................ B-2
|
||
|
||
**Figure 3** Medium Earth Orbit Satellite Constellation .............................................. B-2
|
||
|
||
**Figure 4** 406 MHz MEOSAR System Concept ....................................................... B-2
|
||
|
||
**Figure 5** Cospas-Sarsat Space Segment Tentative Launch Schedule ...................... B-3
|
||
|
||
|
||
**LIST OF ANNEXES**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Annex A** Acronyms and Definition of Terms Used in the Strategic Plan ................ A-1
|
||
|
||
**Annex B** Cospas-Sarsat System Overview ............................................................... B-1
|
||
|
||
**Annex C** Performance Criteria ................................................................................ C-1
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 1-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**1.** **INTRODUCTION**
|
||
|
||
The international Cospas-Sarsat System has been successfully operating since 1982 and has
|
||
achieved world-wide recognition as a provider of satellite distress alerts to search and rescue
|
||
(SAR) authorities. The carriage of Cospas-Sarsat distress beacons onboard aircraft [1] and
|
||
ships [2] is mandated by Administrations in accordance with the recommendations of the
|
||
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Maritime
|
||
Organization (IMO). Their use onboard fishing vessels, pleasure craft and general aviation
|
||
aircraft is also a requirement in numerous countries. Furthermore, non-mandated usage of
|
||
distress beacons is becoming increasingly popular among individuals at risk in difficult or
|
||
dangerous environments [3] .
|
||
|
||
The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme is faced with challenges and changes that
|
||
provide an opportunity to establish long-term goals and identify new opportunities and
|
||
priorities. This Strategic Plan recognises these challenges and opportunities, and charts a
|
||
course ahead.
|
||
|
||
The scope of this Strategic Plan and the Programme background are presented in section 2 of
|
||
this document.
|
||
|
||
The long-term strategic goals of the Programme were developed for a 20-year horizon. The
|
||
strategic goals, associated medium term objectives, and near term actions that support these
|
||
objectives are described in section 3.
|
||
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat achievements towards reaching each of these goals will be monitored and
|
||
evaluated using appropriate performance indicators.
|
||
|
||
The following terms are used in this document with specific meanings:
|
||
|
||
Customers: SAR authorities to whom Cospas-Sarsat delivers distress alert and location
|
||
data.
|
||
|
||
Users: Persons or organisations who own or use distress beacons compatible with the
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat System.
|
||
|
||
System: The network of satellites, ground receiving stations (also called Local User
|
||
Terminals or LUTs), Mission Control Centres (MCCs) and associated
|
||
communication links that detects, processes and delivers distress alert and
|
||
location data to the Cospas-Sarsat customers.
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs) are carried onboard aircraft.
|
||
2 Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRBs) are carried onboard ships.
|
||
3 Distress beacons used by individuals in various environments are called Personal Locator Beacons (PLBs).
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 1-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
In the context of this strategic plan, the term “Cospas-Sarsat” encompasses:
|
||
|
||
`-` The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme established under the International
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement signed on 1 July 1988
|
||
|
||
`-` The four Parties (Canada, France, Russia, USA) who are signatories to the
|
||
International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement
|
||
|
||
`-` The States non-Party to the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement
|
||
and organisations, who have formally notified their association with the
|
||
Programme (the Participants)
|
||
|
||
`-` The Council, which oversees the implementation of the Agreement and
|
||
co-ordinates the activities of the Parties and Participants
|
||
|
||
`-` The Secretariat, the permanent administrative body of the Programme, which
|
||
takes direction from the Council
|
||
|
||
`-` Policies, standards and processes, as detailed in Cospas-Sarsat documents
|
||
approved by the Council
|
||
|
||
Other definitions of terms and acronyms used in the Strategic Plan are provided at Annex A.
|
||
|
||
Annex B provides an overview of the Cospas-Sarsat System and its planned evolution.
|
||
|
||
Annex C describes the search and rescue performance criteria set by ICAO and IMO for the
|
||
provision of distress alert and location data and the actual performance of the Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
System.
|
||
|
||
- END OF SECTION 1
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 2-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**2.** **SCOPE OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN AND PROGRAMME BACKGROUND**
|
||
|
||
**2.1** **Scope of the Strategic Plan**
|
||
|
||
The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme is faced with upcoming changes, new
|
||
opportunities and challenges in several areas. These include the opportunities arising
|
||
from an increasing number of participating countries and a growing user base, and the
|
||
challenges presented by the continued provision of effective System operation,
|
||
evolving user needs and the planned integration of a Medium-altitude Earth-Orbiting
|
||
Search and Rescue (MEOSAR) satellite system.
|
||
|
||
The Strategic Plan recognises these changes, challenges and opportunities, and charts a
|
||
course that takes them into account within the strategic goals of the Programme. The
|
||
Plan discusses priorities within the context of the Programme mission, and provides a
|
||
strategic framework for improvements and stronger relationships with stakeholders,
|
||
customers and users. This Plan will guide the Parties and Participants associated with
|
||
the Programme, and aid the Cospas-Sarsat Council (the Council) in making decisions
|
||
in respect to short-term and medium-term issues. It will also inform other interested
|
||
parties and stakeholders about Programme strategic priorities.
|
||
|
||
The key stakeholders include SAR Authorities (Cospas-Sarsat customers), regulatory
|
||
Administrations, ICAO, IMO, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU),
|
||
international and national standards organisations, the System’s users and industry.
|
||
|
||
While this Plan covers the twenty-year period 2008 to 2028, the Council intends to
|
||
review it as necessary.
|
||
|
||
The strategic goals established in section 3 of this Plan:
|
||
|
||
`-` reflect the agreement of Participants on how the Programme should evolve within
|
||
a twenty-year horizon,
|
||
|
||
`-` identify priority actions and objectives for the Programme,
|
||
|
||
`-` convey to customers and other stakeholders the long-term goals of the
|
||
Programme, and
|
||
|
||
`-` demonstrate the intention of the Programme to continue providing required
|
||
services in the future.
|
||
|
||
All goals, objectives and actions in this plan are developed within the framework of the
|
||
1988 International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 2-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**2.2** **Cospas-Sarsat Programme Background**
|
||
|
||
The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme aims to reduce, as far as possible, delays
|
||
in the provision of distress alerts to the search and rescue authorities and the time
|
||
required to locate a distress, as these have a direct impact on the probability of survival
|
||
of the person in distress. The rapid detection and location of distress events also
|
||
contributes to the reduction of the costs of SAR operations and risks faced by rescuers.
|
||
|
||
To achieve this objective, Cospas-Sarsat Participants implement, maintain, co-ordinate
|
||
and operate a multi-national satellite system on a long-term basis. The System is
|
||
capable of detecting distress alert transmissions from radiobeacons that comply with
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat specifications and performance standards, and of determining their
|
||
position anywhere on the globe. Cospas-Sarsat Participants have also implemented a
|
||
robust Ground Segment and a unique, worldwide data distribution system that provides
|
||
in a timely and reliable manner Cospas-Sarsat distress alert messages to the appropriate
|
||
SAR Points of Contact (SPOCs) and Rescue Coordination Centres (RCCs).
|
||
|
||
An overview of the Cospas-Sarsat System and its performance can be found at
|
||
Annex B and Annex C to this document, and in the document C/S G.003 “Introduction
|
||
to the Cospas-Sarsat System”.
|
||
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat is currently developing a third generation satellite alerting capability.
|
||
The MEOSAR system, which is planned to begin operating in the 2012 - 2015
|
||
timeframe, is expected to provide global, near-instantaneous alerting and locating
|
||
capabilities for existing and new generation 406 MHz distress beacons. The MEOSAR
|
||
system will provide a potential for enhanced performance, including greater resilience
|
||
to beacon-to-satellite obstructions and a possible return link to the beacon. Detailed
|
||
information on MEOSAR system development is available in the document C/S R.012
|
||
“Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz MEOSAR Implementation Plan”.
|
||
|
||
**2.3** **Trend Analysis of User Demand**
|
||
|
||
Changes in technology, expanding user groups and new national and international
|
||
regulations are creating unique challenges for the Programme. In particular, future user
|
||
demand is expected to reflect the following major trends:
|
||
|
||
`-` a swift increase of the number of non-mandated users who purchase beacons on a
|
||
voluntary basis in the context of decreasing beacon prices,
|
||
|
||
`-` limited growth of the number of mandated users,
|
||
|
||
`-` new user segments with high expectations for system performance that would take
|
||
advantage of evolving technologies, including devices that combine several
|
||
functionalities, and
|
||
|
||
`-` a large global demand for locating and communication devices for non-distress
|
||
applications.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 2-3 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
These trends and changes in technology open opportunities for new regional or global
|
||
satellite systems that may offer locating and communication services on a commercial
|
||
basis, including distress alerting.
|
||
|
||
The Cospas-Sarsat System was established by governments to provide distress alerting
|
||
and locating services on a global, non-discriminatory basis and free-of-charge for the
|
||
user in distress. It operates in frequency bands assigned by the ITU which are strictly
|
||
reserved for distress alerting, i.e. in situations of grave and imminent danger to the
|
||
safety of human life.
|
||
|
||
In line with the mandate of the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement,
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat provides a distress alerting and location service to SAR authorities.
|
||
While Cospas-Sarsat does not intend to compete with commercial systems that offer
|
||
other communication or locating services, it will seek to continuously improve its
|
||
distress alerting and locating service, as practical and necessary to meet the long-term
|
||
SAR requirements of ICAO and IMO, and its users' and customers' expectations.
|
||
|
||
To manage the impact of the trends identified above, Cospas-Sarsat has devised
|
||
strategies to successfully:
|
||
|
||
`-` identify the System’s core user segment and address opportunities as well as
|
||
potential threats which could result from uncontrolled growth,
|
||
|
||
`-` address user needs while maintaining the control of specifications and standards,
|
||
|
||
`-` address the evolving needs and expectations of SAR authorities, and
|
||
|
||
`-` monitor System operations and use, and manage the available frequency spectrum
|
||
to meet System capacity requirements.
|
||
|
||
- END OF SECTION 2
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.** **STRATEGIC GOALS FOR THE COSPAS-SARSAT PROGRAMME**
|
||
|
||
_**Mission Statement**_
|
||
|
||
The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme provides accurate, timely and reliable distress
|
||
alert and location data to help search and rescue authorities assist persons in distress.
|
||
|
||
_**Programme Strategy**_
|
||
|
||
The Programme will emphasise cooperation and partnership in order to achieve its goals. As
|
||
no country or organisation has the resources to implement and operate an international
|
||
satellite-aided search and rescue system on its own, success is only achieved through
|
||
international cooperation and partnership among States and organisations. Furthermore, the
|
||
Programme will strive to raise awareness of the System through education and outreach.
|
||
Knowledge of the System and its capacity is important to ensure that users and customers
|
||
realise the full potential of the System.
|
||
|
||
_**Strategic Goals**_
|
||
|
||
The Cospas-Sarsat strategic goals were established for a twenty-year time frame after
|
||
considering the mission of the Programme and its past accomplishments. The following five
|
||
strategic goals have been identified:
|
||
|
||
1. Continuous and effective System operation.
|
||
|
||
2. A comprehensive management structure to support System evolution and
|
||
ensure Programme continuity.
|
||
|
||
3. Worldwide support for the Programme.
|
||
|
||
4. Participants, users and customers use and operate the System to its full
|
||
potential.
|
||
|
||
5. A robust industrial base to support System operations.
|
||
|
||
Each strategic goal is subdivided into medium-term objectives that can be reviewed and
|
||
revised by the Council to align with actual developments in the Programme. Each objective
|
||
is further detailed in a number of near-term actions to be accomplished to reach the desired
|
||
objective.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.1** **STRATEGIC GOAL 1:** **CONTINUOUS AND EFFECTIVE SYSTEM**
|
||
**OPERATIONS**
|
||
|
||
The detection and location with minimum delay of an aircraft crash, a ship in distress or an
|
||
individual in imminent danger are of paramount importance to the search and rescue (SAR)
|
||
teams and to the potential survivors. Studies show that survival rates after a distress at sea or
|
||
after an aircraft crash rapidly decrease with time, particularly in circumstances where
|
||
survivors are injured, hypothermic or exposed to the elements. Furthermore, the availability
|
||
of accurate distress location data can significantly reduce both SAR costs and the exposure of
|
||
rescue forces to hazardous conditions, and improve SAR operational efficiency. CospasSarsat will strive to improve the accuracy, timeliness and reliability of alert data delivered to
|
||
SAR authorities.
|
||
|
||
Recognising the risk and possible delays associated with space segment activities,
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat aims to provide continuity of Space and Ground Segment operations within the
|
||
twenty-year timeframe of this strategic plan by integrating new MEOSAR capabilities into
|
||
the existing System.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.1** **Objective 1: Deliver distress alerts to the appropriate Search and Rescue**
|
||
**Points of Contact (SPOCs)**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Coordinate with ICAO, IMO and other appropriate bodies to identify
|
||
SPOCs and ensure that proper arrangements and systems are in place
|
||
to deliver alerts.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Establish procedures for each MCC to identify a backup SPOC in
|
||
case of communication failure with the primary SPOC.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.2** **Objective 2: Maintain or improve location accuracy**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Ensure ground segment equipment is correctly operated, monitored
|
||
and maintained.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Investigate possible improvements to location accuracy associated
|
||
with the space, ground and beacon segments.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Develop the capability to locate fast moving 406 MHz ELTs at
|
||
elevation based on location requirements to be determined by
|
||
stakeholders.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.3** **Objective 3: Improve timeliness of distress alert delivery**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Maintain and evaluate reliable communication links throughout the
|
||
System and to SPOCs by, among other things, using regular two-way
|
||
communication tests.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-3 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Promote the use of emerging technologies and processes to improve
|
||
the delivery of distress alerts to SPOCs.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Encourage Administrations to facilitate and promote the use of
|
||
distress beacons with navigational input to enable rapid location using
|
||
the GEOSAR system.
|
||
|
||
Action 4: Coordinate and maximise Space Segment contributions to reduce wait
|
||
time for beacon detection and ensure optimal coverage.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.4** **Objective 4: Ensure reliability of distress beacons**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Identify a strategy to monitor the performance of beacons post typeapproval.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Encourage SAR authorities to assess beacon performance during SAR
|
||
incident analyses and provide this information to the Programme.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Establish a mechanism to provide feedback to manufacturers on
|
||
beacon performance.
|
||
|
||
Action 4: For those so equipped, ensure their ability to acquire reliable and
|
||
accurate Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) position data.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.5** **Objective 5: Manage System capacity to accommodate increasing beacon**
|
||
**population**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Coordinate with Administrations and the ITU to protect the System
|
||
uplink and downlink frequency bands.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Update the Cospas-Sarsat Frequency Management Plan (C/S T.012)
|
||
to include a model of the MEOSAR system capacity.
|
||
|
||
**3.1.6** **Objective 6: Ensure seamless integration of the MEOSAR system**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Provide a capability to detect and locate distress beacons globally,
|
||
near instantaneously, by encouraging Space Segment Providers to
|
||
continue providing LEOSAR and GEOSAR capabilities.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Encourage Ground Segment Providers to continue operating
|
||
GEOLUTs and LEOLUTs _._
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Develop a risk management plan to maintain the current level of
|
||
System performance and ensure the detection and location of distress
|
||
events.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-4 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.1.7** **Objective 7: Implement the MEOSAR space and ground segments**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Complete the Cospas-Sarsat MEOSAR Demonstration and
|
||
Evaluation (D&E) and generate a report making recommendations for
|
||
MEOSAR system implementation.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Consider possible new or revised specifications and type approval
|
||
standards for beacons operating with the MEOSAR system that
|
||
would enhance performance, provide new capabilities and/or allow
|
||
lower beacon costs.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Coordinate the implementation of a MEOSAR ground segment in
|
||
order to ensure a full operational capability.
|
||
|
||
Action 4: Investigate strategies to coordinate and operate the MEOSAR space
|
||
segment.
|
||
|
||
Action 5: Plan for the implementation of a return-link capability.
|
||
|
||
**3.2** **STRATEGIC GOAL 2:** **A** **COMPREHENSIVE** **MANAGEMENT**
|
||
**STRUCTURE** **TO** **SUPPORT** **SYSTEM**
|
||
**EVOLUTION AND ENSURE PROGRAMME**
|
||
**CONTINUITY**
|
||
|
||
Provision of an effective management structure and appropriate legal framework is crucial to
|
||
the continued ability of the Cospas-Sarsat Programme to perform its mission while
|
||
maintaining the flexibility to take advantage of emerging opportunities. In respect of System
|
||
operations, effective management requires the development and implementation of a Quality
|
||
Management System. Effective management also requires transparency and accountability in
|
||
all aspects of the Programme activities, including the Programme Common Costs. In
|
||
addition, a comprehensive Programme management demands that the Council and
|
||
Participants remain aware of the evolving environment in which the System operates.
|
||
|
||
**3.2.1** **Objective 1: Provide** **an** **effective** **management** **structure** **to** **support**
|
||
**operational Programme activities**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Investigate the possible implementation of centrally managed
|
||
activities for the Programme, including communications, beacon
|
||
registration, and Ground Segment operations.
|
||
|
||
**3.2.2** **Objective 2: Establish the appropriate legal framework to support the**
|
||
**Programme evolution**
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-5 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Assess the suitability of existing legal instruments for the
|
||
coordination and management of an operational MEOSAR system,
|
||
and recommend possible actions for the timely implementation of
|
||
required changes.
|
||
|
||
**3.2.3** **Objective 3: Acquire and efficiently manage Programme financial and human**
|
||
**resources**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Ensure appropriate funding for the Programme Common Costs to
|
||
maintain effective and efficient coordination of activities.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Maintain effective management and oversight of the Programme
|
||
Common Costs, including adequate risk management strategies to
|
||
address potential liabilities.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Evaluate and plan for future human resource needs.
|
||
|
||
**3.2.4** **Objective 4: Establish a Quality Management System (QMS)**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Maintain a System monitoring tool, to include a feedback mechanism
|
||
to address nonconformity within the System.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Maintain a Cospas-Sarsat model course for Cospas-Sarsat Ground
|
||
Segment operators.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Investigate improvements to the Cospas-Sarsat Quality Management
|
||
System (including MEOSAR).
|
||
|
||
**3.2.5** **Objective 5: Maintain awareness of the environment in which the System**
|
||
**operates**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Periodically review the regulatory environment.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Conduct reviews of emerging trends and opportunities and consult
|
||
with stakeholders to assess possible impacts.
|
||
|
||
**3.3** **STRATEGIC GOAL 3:** **WORLD** **WIDE** **SUPPORT** **FOR** **THE**
|
||
**PROGRAMME**
|
||
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat will strive to maintain a Programme that is well recognised internationally. By
|
||
promoting participation in the System and enhancing support for the Programme, CospasSarsat will enhance its ability to maintain the Cospas-Sarsat System, ensure its continuity,
|
||
and assist SAR authorities worldwide. Cospas-Sarsat must also manage the expectations of
|
||
stakeholders by making sure they are aware of the capabilities and limitations of the System.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-6 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.3.1** **Objective 1: Promote adoption and use of Cospas-Sarsat standards and**
|
||
**specifications**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Actively cooperate with standards organisations to ensure consistency
|
||
of international and national standards with Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
requirements.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Support Administrations in implementing Cospas-Sarsat standards
|
||
and specifications.
|
||
|
||
**3.3.2** **Objective 2: Expand involvement with and use of the Cospas-Sarsat System**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Identify Administrations that would benefit from using the System
|
||
and support, to the extent possible, their use of Cospas-Sarsat data.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Encourage a wider use of the International Beacon Registration
|
||
Database (IBRD) to make beacon registration data readily available
|
||
to SAR authorities.
|
||
|
||
**3.3.3** **Objective 3: Manage stakeholder expectations**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Liaise with appropriate international organisations to publicise
|
||
System performance and inform user groups of System capabilities
|
||
and Programme objectives.
|
||
|
||
**3.4** **STRATEGIC GOAL 4:** **PARTICIPANTS, USERS AND CUSTOMERS**
|
||
**USE AND OPERATE THE SYSTEM TO ITS**
|
||
**FULL POTENTIAL**
|
||
|
||
While the Programme has been successful to date and large numbers of people have benefited
|
||
from use of the System, there are many more who are at risk and not aware of the capabilities
|
||
and potential benefits of distress beacons. Cospas-Sarsat needs to assist Administrations in
|
||
educating potential users. In addition, to allow efficient operation of the Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
System, users have to be aware of certain important requirements including the need to
|
||
register, properly operate and dispose of beacons.
|
||
|
||
**3.4.1** **Objective 1: Raise user awareness on the availability and proper use of the**
|
||
**System**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Develop a plan to educate users on the proper use and benefits of the
|
||
System.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Analyse the causes of false alerts to promote corrective actions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-7 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.4.2** **Objective 2: Promote complete and accurate beacon registration**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Encourage Administrations to establish policies and regulations to
|
||
maximise registration of 406 MHz beacons and ensure registration
|
||
data held is accurate.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Maintain the IBRD to facilitate user and customer access to
|
||
registration information.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Identify and assess possible means to ensure data held in the IBRD is
|
||
properly maintained and protected.
|
||
|
||
Action 4: Maintain IBRD user interface to ensure that beacon owners correctly
|
||
enter beacon data.
|
||
|
||
**3.4.3** **Objective 3: Ensure Participants’ awareness of the System and Programme to**
|
||
**realise their full potential**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Develop information documents on Cospas-Sarsat operations for
|
||
Participant representative at varying levels of government.
|
||
|
||
**3.4.4** **Objective 4: Ensure Customers’ awareness of the System to realise its full**
|
||
**potential**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Develop standardised training modules that can be used in
|
||
international training programmes.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Work with international agencies to conduct training seminars for
|
||
non-Participants.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Coordinate with Administrations for the proper use, training and
|
||
testing on 406 MHz beacons (including, false alerts and beacon’s end
|
||
of life issues).
|
||
|
||
**3.5** **STRATEGIC GOAL 5:** **A ROBUST INDUSTRIAL BASE TO SUPPORT**
|
||
**SYSTEM OPERATIONS**
|
||
|
||
The continued availability of affordable and reliable ground segment equipment and beacons
|
||
that meet evolving needs and Cospas-Sarsat requirements is dependent on a robust and active
|
||
industrial base, and its ability to use and integrate newly developed technologies. Adoption
|
||
of new technologies can be stimulated by a competitive environment.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 3-8 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**3.5.1** **Objective 1: Facilitate fair and streamlined supplier access to the Cospas-**
|
||
**Sarsat beacon market**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Ensure Cospas-Sarsat maintains adequate resources and expertise to
|
||
provide effective and timely review of beacon type approval
|
||
applications.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Encourage and facilitate the acceptance of testing laboratories by
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat to ensure adequate capabilities for the timely
|
||
implementation of type approval testing.
|
||
|
||
Action 3: Encourage the adoption of policies that broaden the choice of beacons
|
||
available to users.
|
||
|
||
**3.5.2** **Objective 2: Encourage the diversity of providers of Ground Segment**
|
||
**equipment**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Facilitate manufacturers’ access to Cospas-Sarsat documentation and
|
||
information to promote fair and open competition principles.
|
||
|
||
Action 2: Maintain independent expertise within the Programme for the
|
||
analysis of System performance and the development of
|
||
requirements.
|
||
|
||
**3.5.3 Objective 3:** **Consider opportunities to lower beacon costs and improve beacon**
|
||
**capabilities and performance**
|
||
|
||
Action 1: Provide timely review of new technology developments and
|
||
investigate proposals that could lower the cost or increase the
|
||
functionality of 406 MHz beacons.
|
||
|
||
- END OF SECTION 3
|
||
|
||
## **ANNEXES** **TO** **THE COSPAS-SARSAT** **STRATEGIC PLAN**
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 A-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**ANNEX A**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS**
|
||
**USED IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN**
|
||
|
||
**1.** **ACRONYMS**
|
||
|
||
**COSPAS** Russian acronym meaning Space System for the Search of Vessels in
|
||
Distress
|
||
|
||
**ELT** Emergency Locator Transmitter
|
||
|
||
**EPIRB** Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon
|
||
|
||
**EUMETSAT** European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
|
||
|
||
**GEO** Geostationary Earth Orbit
|
||
|
||
**GEOLUT** Local User Terminal in a GEOSAR System
|
||
|
||
**GEOSAR** Geostationary satellite system for Search and Rescue
|
||
|
||
**GOES** Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite
|
||
|
||
**GNSS** Global Navigation Satellite System
|
||
|
||
**IBRD** International Beacon Registration Database
|
||
|
||
**ICAO** International Civil Aviation Organization
|
||
|
||
**ICSPA** International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement
|
||
|
||
**IMO** International Maritime Organization
|
||
|
||
**ITU** International Telecommunication Union
|
||
|
||
**LEO** Low-altitude Earth Orbit
|
||
|
||
**LEOLUT** Local User Terminal in a LEOSAR System
|
||
|
||
**LEOSAR** Low-altitude Earth Orbit satellite system for Search and Rescue
|
||
|
||
**LUT** Local User Terminal (ground receiving station)
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 A-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**MCC** Mission Control Centre
|
||
|
||
**MEO** Medium-altitude Earth Orbit
|
||
|
||
**MEOLUT** Local User Terminal in a MEOSAR system
|
||
|
||
**MEOSAR** Medium-altitude Earth-Orbit satellite system for Search and Rescue
|
||
|
||
**PLB** Personal Locator Beacon
|
||
|
||
**QMS** Quality Management System
|
||
|
||
**RCC** Rescue Coordination Centre
|
||
|
||
**SAR** Search and Rescue
|
||
|
||
**SARP** Search and Rescue Processor
|
||
|
||
**SARR** Search and Rescue Repeater
|
||
|
||
**SARSAT** Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking
|
||
|
||
**SPOC** SAR Point of Contact
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 A-3 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**2.** **DEFINITIONS OF TERMS**
|
||
|
||
**Beacon** A radiobeacon designed to be activated in a distress
|
||
**(Cospas-Sarsat beacon)** situation and to transmit a radio signal on the frequency of
|
||
406 MHz, the characteristics of which comply with
|
||
appropriate provisions of the International
|
||
Telecommunication Union and Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
specifications. The radiobeacon may include ancillary
|
||
devices to improve System performance and search and
|
||
rescue response.
|
||
|
||
**Cospas-Sarsat** In the context of this strategic plan, the term
|
||
“Cospas-Sarsat” encompasses:
|
||
|
||
`-` The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme established
|
||
under the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme
|
||
Agreement signed on 1 July 1988,
|
||
|
||
`-` The four Parties (Canada, France, Russia, USA) who are
|
||
signatories to the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
Programme Agreement (document C/S P.001),
|
||
|
||
`-` The States non-Party to the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
Programme Agreement and organisations who have
|
||
formally notified their association with the Programme
|
||
(the Participants),
|
||
|
||
`-` The Council, which oversees the implementation of the
|
||
Agreement and co-ordinates the activities of the Parties
|
||
and Participants,
|
||
|
||
`-` The Secretariat, the permanent administrative body of
|
||
the Programme, which takes direction from the Council,
|
||
|
||
`-` Policies, standards and processes, as detailed in
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat documents approved by the Council.
|
||
|
||
**Council** The Cospas-Sarsat Council established in accordance with
|
||
**(Cospas-Sarsat Council)** Articles 7, 8 and 9 of the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
Programme Agreement.
|
||
|
||
**Customers** SAR authorities to whom Cospas-Sarsat delivers distress
|
||
alert and location data.
|
||
|
||
**Ground Segment Operator** Any Organisation which establishes and operates Ground
|
||
Segment equipment, avails itself of the System and
|
||
becomes associated with the Programme in accordance with
|
||
provisions set forth by the Council under the terms of the
|
||
ICSPA.
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 A-4 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**Ground Segment Provider** A State which establishes and operates Ground Segment
|
||
equipment under the terms of Article 11 and Article 12 of
|
||
the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme Agreement.
|
||
|
||
**Participants** The States non-Party to the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
Programme Agreement, who have formally notified their
|
||
association with the Programme either as a Ground
|
||
Segment Provider or as a User-State.
|
||
|
||
**Party (to the International** A State for which the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
**Cospas-Sarsat Programme** Programme Agreement has entered into force.
|
||
**Agreement)**
|
||
|
||
**Programme**
|
||
|
||
Those activities carried out by the Parties to provide,
|
||
operate and coordinate the Cospas-Sarsat System in
|
||
accordance with the International Cospas-Sarsat
|
||
Programme Agreement.
|
||
|
||
**Stakeholder** Any organisation which has a vested interest in the
|
||
International Cospas-Sarsat Programme, the System and its
|
||
operation.
|
||
|
||
**System** The network of satellites, ground receiving stations (also
|
||
called Local User Terminals or LUTs), Mission Control
|
||
Centres (MCCs) and associated communication links that
|
||
detects, processes and delivers distress alert and location
|
||
data to the Cospas-Sarsat customers.
|
||
|
||
**Users** Persons or organisations who own or use distress beacons
|
||
compatible with the Cospas-Sarsat System.
|
||
|
||
**User State** A State that avails itself of the System under the terms of
|
||
Article 12 of the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme
|
||
Agreement.
|
||
|
||
- END OF ANNEX A
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 B-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**ANNEX B**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**COSPAS-SARSAT SYSTEM OVERVIEW**
|
||
|
||
**Figure 1: The Existing LEOSAR and GEOSAR Systems**
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 B-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**Figure 2: GEO and LEO Orbits**
|
||
|
||
**Figure 3: Medium Earth Orbit Satellite Constellation**
|
||
|
||
|
||
GPS-III
|
||
|
||
|
||
_**406 MHz**_
|
||
_**Distress**_
|
||
_**Beacon**_
|
||
|
||
|
||
MEO orbits,
|
||
about 20,000 km altitude
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Figure 4: 406 MHz MEOSAR System Concept**
|
||
|
||
|
||
GLONASS
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Galileo**
|
||
**Return link**
|
||
**Service Provider**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**MEOLUT /** **MCC**
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 B-3 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**Figure 5: Cospas-Sarsat Space-Segment Tentative Launch Schedule**
|
||
|
||
|
||
|Col1|2008|2009|2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|2015|Col10|2016|Col12|2017|Col14|2018|2019|Col17|2020|Col19|2021|Col21|2022|2023|2024|2025|Col26|2026|2027|Col29|2028|2029|2030|2031|2032|2033|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
|**LEOSAR **<br>Cospas<br>Sarsat|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**LEOSAR **<br>Cospas<br>Sarsat|||||||||||||||||||u|u|||||||||||||||
|
||
|**LEOSAR **<br>Cospas<br>Sarsat|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**LEOSAR **<br>Cospas<br>Sarsat|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**LEOSAR **<br>Cospas<br>Sarsat|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT||uu|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT||uu|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**GEOSAR **<br>GOES<br>MSG <br>MTG<br>Electro-L/Louch-5<br>INSAT/GSAT|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**MEOSAR **<br>SAR/Galileo<br>(first 28 payloads)<br>SAR/Glonass-K<br>SAR/GPS (L-band)<br>DASS/GPS II (S-band)<br>DASS/GPS III (S-band)||||K1|model|||||||||K2|model|model|||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**MEOSAR **<br>SAR/Galileo<br>(first 28 payloads)<br>SAR/Glonass-K<br>SAR/GPS (L-band)<br>DASS/GPS II (S-band)<br>DASS/GPS III (S-band)|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**MEOSAR **<br>SAR/Galileo<br>(first 28 payloads)<br>SAR/Glonass-K<br>SAR/GPS (L-band)<br>DASS/GPS II (S-band)<br>DASS/GPS III (S-band)|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**MEOSAR **<br>SAR/Galileo<br>(first 28 payloads)<br>SAR/Glonass-K<br>SAR/GPS (L-band)<br>DASS/GPS II (S-band)<br>DASS/GPS III (S-band)|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|**MEOSAR **<br>SAR/Galileo<br>(first 28 payloads)<br>SAR/Glonass-K<br>SAR/GPS (L-band)<br>DASS/GPS II (S-band)<br>DASS/GPS III (S-band)|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 B-4 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**Notes:**
|
||
|
||
|
||
Tentative launch date.
|
||
|
||
|
||
First and final launches of the complete deployment of a MEO constellation with SAR payloads.
|
||
|
||
|
||
**Explanatory Notes (Figure 5):**
|
||
|
||
|
||
1. Cospas: Satellites are provided by Russia and carry search and rescue processor (SARP) instruments.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. Sarsat: Satellites are provided by the USA and EUMETSAT. Search and rescue repeater (SARR) instruments are provided by Canada and SARP instruments
|
||
are provided by France.
|
||
|
||
|
||
3. GOES: Satellites and SAR instruments provided by USA.
|
||
|
||
|
||
4. MSG: Satellite and SAR instruments provided by EUMETSAT.
|
||
|
||
|
||
5. MTG: Satellite and SAR instruments provided by EUMETSAT.
|
||
|
||
|
||
6. Electro-L/Luch-5A: Satellites and SAR instruments provided by Russia.
|
||
|
||
|
||
7. INSAT/GSAT: Satellite _s_ and SAR instruments provided by India.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. SAR/Galileo: The first 30 Galileo satellites carrying a total of 28 SAR instrument are planned to be deployed between 2012 and 2019.
|
||
|
||
|
||
9. SAR/Glonass-K: SAR instruments planned to be carried on the Russian GNSS Glonass-K1 and Glonass-K2 satellites.
|
||
|
||
|
||
10. SAR/GPS: Negotiations are underway to provide SA ~~RR~~ instruments on USA GPS III GNSS; the first launch ready date is 2023. After this first launch a GPS
|
||
constellation of 24 satellites with SAR instruments should be in place within 10 years.
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF ANNEX B
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 C-1 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
**ANNEX C**
|
||
|
||
|
||
**PERFORMANCE CRITERIA**
|
||
|
||
|
||
The performance criteria were determined by the ICAO/IMO Joint Working Group on
|
||
Harmonization of Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (JWG 13) in 2006 and
|
||
endorsed at JWG 14 in 2007.
|
||
|
||
|
||
This table captures performance criteria and lists Cospas-Sarsat existing or future
|
||
capabilities.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|Performance Criteria|Existing LEO/GEO Capability|Future MEO Capability|
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
|Global coverage|Performance criterion is met.<br>Current constellation of LEOSAR<br>and GEOSAR satellites provides<br>global coverage.|MEOSAR system is being<br>designed to meet performance<br>criterion of global coverage.|
|
||
|Signal activation without<br>human intervention|Performance criterion is met by<br>some beacon types.<br>Administrations set the<br>requirements for beacon activation.|This performance criterion is<br>applicable to the beacon segment<br>of the system and the MEOSAR<br>system is being designed to relay<br>this type of beacon|
|
||
|Distress alert provided to<br>responsible RCC within<br>5 minutes|Performance criterion is met.<br>Based on actual performance:<br>GEOSAR distress alert detections<br>provided to responsible RCC<br>within 3 minutes.<br>Distress alerts with position data<br>provided within 3 minutes for 85 %<br>of beacons that transmit encoded<br>GNSS position data.<br>Distress alerts with Doppler<br>derived positions provided within<br>47 minutes on average.|MEOSAR performance<br>capabilities are in the process of<br>being validated. The system is<br>being designed to provide distress<br>alerts to the responsible RCC<br>within 5 minutes.|
|
||
|
||
|
||
P16DEC.16 C-2 C/S P.016 - Issue 1 - Rev.6
|
||
|
||
|Performance Criteria|Existing LEO/GEO Capability|Future MEO Capability|
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
|Distress alert location<br>provided to an accuracy of<br>5 km or better|<br>Performance criterion is met.<br>Based on actual performance 95%<br>of Doppler derived locations are<br>accurate to within 5 km.<br>Encoded GNSS positions are<br>provided to a Lat/Long resolution<br>of 4 sec (about 100 m accuracy).|The MEOSAR system is being<br>designed and developed to exceed<br>this criterion.|
|
||
|Beacon capability for<br>transmission of both<br>distress and homing<br>signals, for a minimum<br>period of 48 hours under<br>temperature conditions<br>between -40°C and +40°C|Many type approved beacons meet<br>these criteria. Not applicable to all<br>beacons as Administrations set the<br>operational requirements for<br>beacons.|This performance criterion is<br>applicable to the beacon segment<br>of the system and the MEOSAR<br>system is being designed to relay<br>this type of beacon. Many type<br>approved beacons will continue to<br>meet this criterion|
|
||
|Beacon survivability|Administrations set the<br>survivability requirements for<br>beacon specification.|This performance criterion is<br>applicable to the beacon segment<br>of the system and the MEOSAR<br>system is being designed to relay<br>this type of beacon. Many type<br>approved beacons will continue to<br>meet this criterion|
|
||
|Distressed craft ID<br>transmission facility|Performance criterion is met.<br>Vessel or aircraft ID can be<br>encoded in the beacon message<br>and/or is held in a beacon registry<br>and available to RCCs.|Performance criterion will be met.|
|
||
|
||
|
||
- END OF ANNEX C
|
||
- END OF DOCUMENT
|
||
|
||
Cospas-Sarsat Secretariat
|
||
1250 boulevard René-Lévesque West, Suite 4215, Montréal, Québec H3B 4W8 Canada
|
||
Telephone: + 1 514 500 7999 Fax: + 1 514 500 7996
|
||
Email: mail@cospas-sarsat.int
|
||
Website www.cospas-sarsat.int |