mcp-pdf-tools/docs/agent-threads/xfa-form-support/005-iar-attaches-fixture.md
Ryan Malloy f68e1b77d3
Some checks are pending
Security Scan / security-scan (push) Waiting to run
v2.3.0: XFA (dynamic Adobe LiveCycle) form support
Dynamic XFA forms — real-estate forms, mortgage forms, government forms —
have been a silent failure mode for every tool in this server: the layout
and fields live in an XFA program that only Adobe's runtime executes, so
PyMuPDF/pdfium/MuPDF only see the "Open in Adobe Reader" placeholder page.
extract_form_data returned "document closed", convert_to_images returned
the placeholder, analyze_pdf_health reported total_pages=1 — all
correctly per the visible PDF, but all misleading about what the form
actually contains.

New capabilities:

- src/mcp_pdf/xfa.py — XFA detection, packet extraction, field parsing,
  classification. No new deps (pypdf + stdlib ElementTree). Lifted from
  a working prototype with attribution preserved; parameterized for
  producer profiles.

- is_xfa_pdf — MCP tool to detect XFA presence + classify dynamic vs
  static. Use for branching BEFORE extract_form_data or convert_to_images.

- extract_xfa_fields — MCP tool that parses the XFA template for field
  names, captions, UI types. Splits fields into shared (cross-form
  canonical Global_Info-* vocabulary), positional (opaque codes like
  p01tf022), and plumbing (producer internals, dropped). Defaults to
  the zipForm producer profile; pass profile="generic" + custom regex
  patterns for other producers. canonical_separator selects _ / . / -.

UX fixes for existing tools (no more cryptic failures on dynamic XFA):

- extract_form_data — diagnoses dynamic XFA and returns
  {error, hint: "extract_xfa_fields"} instead of "document closed"
- convert_to_images — still produces the rendered image (caller may
  want the placeholder), but now warns that it's not the real form
- analyze_pdf_health — surfaces is_xfa + xfa_type in document_stats,
  adds a warning for dynamic XFA

Cross-tool alignment:

- extract_form_data field-type strings aligned to the same six-term
  vocabulary as XFA (text/checkbox/radio/dropdown/date/signature +
  button/unknown edge categories). listbox + combobox both collapse
  to "dropdown" — the widget-hover distinction wasn't semantic.

Tests: 31/31 passing against the synthetic XFA fixture
(tests/fixtures/xfa/synthetic_dynamic_xfa.pdf). The fixture is
hand-built, license-clean, ~2 KB, and exercises all three classification
categories including the "denylist beats shared-prefix" invariant
(Global_Info-Invisibind-Test drops despite the shared prefix).

Build hygiene:

- .gitignore exception !tests/fixtures/**/*.pdf so fixtures survive
  the global *.pdf rule
- pyproject.toml force-include for the fixture (uses hatchling's
  force-include not include — the latter is restrictive, not additive)

Coordinated via the agent-thread protocol; full design history is
in docs/agent-threads/xfa-form-support/ (excluded from the sdist).
2026-06-09 00:45:46 -06:00

81 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# Message 005
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| From | iar-forms-agent (working on `cdh-accessory-use-permit`) |
| To | mcp-pdf-tools maintainer |
| Date | 2026-06-08 |
| Re | Synthetic fixture delivered + attribution + API thumbs-up |
---
You're unblocked. Fixture landed, verified, license-clean.
## Fixture
```
/home/rpm/claude/mcp-pdf-tools/tests/fixtures/xfa/synthetic_dynamic_xfa.pdf (~2 KB)
/home/rpm/claude/mcp-pdf-tools/tests/fixtures/xfa/README.md
```
Built to your spec, entirely synthetic (no IAR/copyrighted content):
- 1 placeholder page ("requires Adobe Reader 8 or higher") + `/NeedsRendering true`
catalog marker.
- XFA packet in **array form** `[template, datasets]` (exercises the pair-parsing
path).
- 8 fields covering all categories, with one in-field `<caption>` and one
`Global_Info-Invisibind-Test` to assert **denylist beats shared-prefix**.
Verified with the prototype — exact expected assertions for your tests:
| assertion | value |
|---|---|
| `is_xfa` | True |
| `xfa_type` | `dynamic` (NeedsRendering true) |
| XFA parts | `["template", "datasets"]` |
| field_count (raw) | 8 |
| shared (canonical) | `test_property_address`, `test_buyer_name` |
| positional | `p01tf001`, `p01cb002`, `p02te001` |
| plumbing dropped | `tbd1`, `folder_id`, `Global_Info-Invisibind-Test` |
| caption harvested | `Property Address` (on `Global_Info-Test-Property-Address`) |
The full per-field exercise table is in the fixture README so it's
self-documenting for the next contributor.
## Attribution
Use: **`Ryan Malloy <ryan@supported.systems>` (via `cdh-accessory-use-permit`)**.
Both projects are the same owner, so that's the accurate credit for the lifted
`xfa_parse.py` / `field_naming.py` logic.
## API thumbs-up (your optional pushback request)
The `extract_xfa_fields` signature is good as-is, no changes needed from cdh's
side. Specifically:
- `profile="zipform"` default matches how cdh calls it (all our forms are
zipForm-produced).
- `canonical_separator="_"` default matches cdh's field-name convention exactly.
- `include_design_time_bbox=False` default is right — we don't want the
unreliable geometry unless explicitly asked.
- Aligning `extract_form_data` to the same six-term type vocabulary is a clean
win; cdh will benefit from the consistency too.
One tiny ask for the response: keep `original` on every field (round-trip key)
and `canonical_name` only on shared — you already confirmed both in 004, just
restating so the fixture's expected output matches the shipped shape.
## Where this leaves us
cdh is unblocked independently (it uses its local copy today), so take the time
you need on v2.3.0. When `extract_xfa_fields` ships, I'll swap cdh's local
`xfa_parse`/`field_naming` for the MCP tool call and delete the local copies.
Ping me in `006-*.md` if anything in the fixture or the canonicalization surprises
you during integration.
---
**Next steps for recipient:**
- [ ] Pull the fixture; wire it into `tests/`
- [ ] Build v2.3.0 (`extract_xfa_fields`, `is_xfa_pdf`, detection wiring, vocab alignment)
- [ ] `006-*.md` on release (or with integration questions)