Ryan Malloy
f231c6079a
- Implement recursive dependency resolution with cycle detection - Add include_transitive and max_depth parameters - Create dependency tree visualization with complexity scoring - Add performance impact assessment and maintenance risk analysis - Provide comprehensive circular dependency detection and reporting
271 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
271 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
# Transitive Dependency Implementation Summary
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
Successfully implemented comprehensive transitive dependency analysis for the PyPI Query MCP Server's `get_package_dependencies` tool. The enhancement maintains full backward compatibility while adding powerful new features for dependency tree analysis.
|
||
|
||
## Files Modified
|
||
|
||
### 1. `/pypi_query_mcp/tools/package_query.py`
|
||
**Changes:**
|
||
- Enhanced `query_package_dependencies()` function with new parameters:
|
||
- `include_transitive: bool = False`
|
||
- `max_depth: int = 5`
|
||
- `python_version: str | None = None`
|
||
- Added `format_transitive_dependency_info()` function for comprehensive result formatting
|
||
- Implemented multiple helper functions for advanced analysis:
|
||
- `_build_dependency_tree_structure()` - Hierarchical tree building
|
||
- `_extract_all_packages_info()` - Package metadata extraction
|
||
- `_detect_circular_dependencies()` - Circular dependency detection
|
||
- `_analyze_dependency_depths()` - Depth distribution analysis
|
||
- `_calculate_complexity_score()` - Dependency complexity scoring
|
||
- `_analyze_potential_conflicts()` - Version conflict detection
|
||
- `_analyze_maintenance_concerns()` - Maintenance risk assessment
|
||
- `_assess_performance_impact()` - Performance impact estimation
|
||
|
||
### 2. `/pypi_query_mcp/server.py`
|
||
**Changes:**
|
||
- Updated MCP tool endpoint `get_package_dependencies()` with new parameters
|
||
- Enhanced parameter passing to underlying function
|
||
- Updated docstring with comprehensive parameter and return value documentation
|
||
- Added new parameters to error response handling
|
||
|
||
## Key Features Implemented
|
||
|
||
### 1. ✅ Transitive Dependency Resolution
|
||
- **Recursive dependency analysis** with configurable depth limits
|
||
- **Integration with existing DependencyResolver** for consistent behavior
|
||
- **Comprehensive tree structure** showing parent-child relationships
|
||
|
||
### 2. ✅ Circular Dependency Handling
|
||
- **Detection algorithm** using depth-first search with path tracking
|
||
- **Prevention of infinite loops** through visited package tracking
|
||
- **Detailed reporting** of circular dependency cycles with cycle length and involved packages
|
||
|
||
### 3. ✅ Performance Safeguards
|
||
- **Maximum depth limits** (default: 5, configurable)
|
||
- **Memory-efficient processing** with streaming dependency resolution
|
||
- **Caching integration** through existing PyPI client
|
||
- **Graceful degradation** for missing or problematic packages
|
||
|
||
### 4. ✅ Comprehensive Analysis
|
||
- **Complexity scoring** with automatic categorization (low/moderate/high/very_high)
|
||
- **Performance impact estimation** (install time, memory usage)
|
||
- **Maintenance risk assessment** with actionable recommendations
|
||
- **Depth distribution analysis** showing dependency tree characteristics
|
||
|
||
### 5. ✅ Advanced Conflict Detection
|
||
- **Version constraint analysis** parsing requirement specifications
|
||
- **Potential conflict identification** for packages with multiple constraints
|
||
- **Severity assessment** (potential vs. high risk conflicts)
|
||
|
||
### 6. ✅ Python Version Filtering
|
||
- **Target version compatibility** filtering dependencies by Python version
|
||
- **Marker evaluation** respecting environment-specific requirements
|
||
- **Cross-version analysis** for deployment planning
|
||
|
||
## Response Format Enhancement
|
||
|
||
### Original Response (Direct Dependencies)
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"package_name": "requests",
|
||
"version": "2.31.0",
|
||
"runtime_dependencies": ["urllib3>=1.21.1", "certifi>=2017.4.17"],
|
||
"development_dependencies": [],
|
||
"optional_dependencies": {},
|
||
"dependency_summary": {
|
||
"runtime_count": 4,
|
||
"dev_count": 0,
|
||
"optional_groups": 2
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Enhanced Response (Transitive Dependencies)
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"package_name": "requests",
|
||
"version": "2.31.0",
|
||
"include_transitive": true,
|
||
"max_depth": 5,
|
||
"python_version": "3.10",
|
||
|
||
"runtime_dependencies": ["urllib3>=1.21.1", "certifi>=2017.4.17"],
|
||
"development_dependencies": [],
|
||
"optional_dependencies": {},
|
||
|
||
"transitive_dependencies": {
|
||
"dependency_tree": { /* hierarchical structure */ },
|
||
"all_packages": { /* metadata for all packages */ },
|
||
"circular_dependencies": [ /* detected cycles */ ],
|
||
"depth_analysis": { /* depth statistics */ }
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
"dependency_summary": {
|
||
"direct_runtime_count": 4,
|
||
"total_transitive_packages": 8,
|
||
"max_dependency_depth": 3,
|
||
"complexity_score": {
|
||
"score": 25.4,
|
||
"level": "moderate",
|
||
"recommendation": "Moderate complexity, manageable with proper tooling"
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
"analysis": {
|
||
"potential_conflicts": [ /* version conflicts */ ],
|
||
"maintenance_concerns": { /* risk assessment */ },
|
||
"performance_impact": { /* performance metrics */ }
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Backward Compatibility
|
||
|
||
✅ **Fully maintained** - Default `include_transitive=False` preserves existing behavior
|
||
✅ **No breaking changes** - All existing response fields preserved
|
||
✅ **Same tool interface** - Existing MCP clients continue to work unchanged
|
||
|
||
## Error Handling & Edge Cases
|
||
|
||
### 1. ✅ Circular Dependencies
|
||
- **Detection**: Robust cycle detection algorithm
|
||
- **Prevention**: Visited tracking prevents infinite recursion
|
||
- **Reporting**: Detailed cycle information in response
|
||
|
||
### 2. ✅ Missing Packages
|
||
- **Graceful handling**: Continues analysis with available packages
|
||
- **Warning logs**: Clear logging for debugging
|
||
- **Partial results**: Returns analysis for resolvable dependencies
|
||
|
||
### 3. ✅ Network Issues
|
||
- **Retry logic**: Leverages existing PyPI client resilience
|
||
- **Timeout handling**: Prevents hanging operations
|
||
- **Error propagation**: Clear error messages for troubleshooting
|
||
|
||
### 4. ✅ Resource Limits
|
||
- **Depth limits**: Configurable maximum recursion depth
|
||
- **Memory management**: Efficient data structures and cleanup
|
||
- **Performance monitoring**: Built-in metrics and recommendations
|
||
|
||
## Testing Strategy
|
||
|
||
### Test Files Created:
|
||
1. **`test_transitive_deps.py`** - Full integration tests
|
||
2. **`simple_test.py`** - Unit tests for formatting functions
|
||
3. **`example_usage.py`** - Usage examples and expected responses
|
||
|
||
### Test Coverage:
|
||
- ✅ Direct dependencies (backward compatibility)
|
||
- ✅ Transitive dependency resolution
|
||
- ✅ Circular dependency detection
|
||
- ✅ Edge cases and error handling
|
||
- ✅ Performance with complex packages
|
||
|
||
### Recommended Test Packages:
|
||
- **Simple**: `six` (no dependencies)
|
||
- **Moderate**: `requests` (few dependencies)
|
||
- **Complex**: `django` (moderate dependencies)
|
||
- **Very Complex**: `tensorflow` (many dependencies)
|
||
|
||
## Performance Characteristics
|
||
|
||
### Time Complexity:
|
||
- **Direct mode**: O(1) API call
|
||
- **Transitive mode**: O(n × d) where n=packages, d=depth
|
||
- **Worst case**: Limited by max_depth parameter
|
||
|
||
### Space Complexity:
|
||
- **Memory usage**: O(n) for package metadata storage
|
||
- **Network calls**: Cached to reduce redundant requests
|
||
- **Response size**: Proportional to dependency tree size
|
||
|
||
### Optimization Features:
|
||
- ✅ Visited package caching
|
||
- ✅ Early termination on cycles
|
||
- ✅ Configurable depth limits
|
||
- ✅ Streaming processing
|
||
|
||
## Usage Examples
|
||
|
||
### Basic Usage (Backward Compatible)
|
||
```python
|
||
result = await get_package_dependencies("requests")
|
||
# Returns direct dependencies only
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Enable Transitive Analysis
|
||
```python
|
||
result = await get_package_dependencies(
|
||
package_name="requests",
|
||
include_transitive=True
|
||
)
|
||
# Returns complete dependency tree
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Advanced Configuration
|
||
```python
|
||
result = await get_package_dependencies(
|
||
package_name="django",
|
||
include_transitive=True,
|
||
max_depth=3,
|
||
python_version="3.11"
|
||
)
|
||
# Returns filtered tree for Python 3.11, max 3 levels
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Deployment Considerations
|
||
|
||
### 1. **Resource Usage**
|
||
- Monitor memory usage with large dependency trees
|
||
- Consider rate limiting for resource-intensive requests
|
||
- Set appropriate max_depth defaults based on infrastructure
|
||
|
||
### 2. **API Rate Limits**
|
||
- Transitive analysis may increase PyPI API usage
|
||
- Existing caching helps mitigate repeated requests
|
||
- Consider request queuing for high-volume usage
|
||
|
||
### 3. **Response Size**
|
||
- Large dependency trees produce large responses
|
||
- Consider response compression for network efficiency
|
||
- Implement pagination for very large trees if needed
|
||
|
||
## Future Enhancement Opportunities
|
||
|
||
### Short Term:
|
||
1. **Dependency conflict resolution** - Suggest compatible versions
|
||
2. **Security scanning integration** - Check for known vulnerabilities
|
||
3. **License compatibility analysis** - Detect license conflicts
|
||
4. **Performance benchmarking** - Real-world performance data
|
||
|
||
### Long Term:
|
||
1. **Visual dependency graphs** - Export to graph formats
|
||
2. **Automated update planning** - Suggest update strategies
|
||
3. **Dependency impact analysis** - Predict change effects
|
||
4. **Custom filtering rules** - User-defined dependency filters
|
||
|
||
## Documentation
|
||
|
||
### Created Files:
|
||
1. **`TRANSITIVE_DEPS_DOCUMENTATION.md`** - Comprehensive feature documentation
|
||
2. **`IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md`** - This implementation summary
|
||
3. **`example_usage.py`** - Practical usage examples
|
||
|
||
### Key Documentation Points:
|
||
- Complete API reference
|
||
- Response format specification
|
||
- Performance guidelines
|
||
- Error handling details
|
||
- Best practices
|
||
|
||
## Conclusion
|
||
|
||
✅ **Successfully implemented** comprehensive transitive dependency analysis
|
||
✅ **Maintained backward compatibility** with existing functionality
|
||
✅ **Added advanced features** for complex dependency scenarios
|
||
✅ **Included robust safeguards** for performance and reliability
|
||
✅ **Provided comprehensive analysis** tools for dependency management
|
||
✅ **Created thorough documentation** for usage and maintenance
|
||
|
||
The implementation is production-ready and provides significant value for dependency analysis while maintaining the reliability and simplicity of the existing system. |